首页|穿支皮瓣修复术与胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术治疗手外伤软组织缺损的效果比较

穿支皮瓣修复术与胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术治疗手外伤软组织缺损的效果比较

扫码查看
目的 探讨穿支皮瓣修复术和胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术对手外伤软组织缺损患者手功能恢复的影响。方法 选取2019年10月至2022年10月漯河市第二人民医院收治的78例手外伤软组织缺损患者为研究对象。按照随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,每组39例。对照组实施胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术,观察组实施穿支皮瓣修复术。比较两组手术相关指标(创面愈合、抗菌药物使用、住院时间)、炎症因子[白细胞介素-8(IL-8)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)]水平、手部功能评分及并发症发生情况。结果 观察组创面愈合、抗菌药物使用、住院时间均短于对照组(P<0。05)。治疗前,两组IL-8、TNF-α、IL-6水平比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0。05);治疗后,观察组IL-8、TNF-α、IL-6水平均低于对照组(P<0。05)。治疗前,两组手部功能评分比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0。05);治疗后,观察组手部功能评分高于对照组(P<0。05)。观察组并发症发生率(2。56%,2/39)低于对照组(23。08%,9/39),差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 相比于胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术,采用穿支皮瓣修复术治疗效果更佳,可促进手部功能改善,加速恢复,下调炎症因子水平,减轻并发症发生风险。
Effects comparision of perforator flap repair and thoracoabdominal pedicle flap repair in the treatment of soft tissue defects in hand injuries
Objective To investigate the effects of perforator flap repair and thoracoabdominal pedicled flap repair on the recovery of hand function in patients with hand trauma and soft tissue defect.Methods Seventy-eight patients with hand injury soft tissue defects admitted to the Second People's Hospital of Luohe from October 2019 to October 2022 were selected as the research subjects.They were divided into a control group and an observation group using a random number table method,with 39 cases in each group.The control group underwent thoracoabdominal pedicle flap repair,while the observation group underwent perforator flap repair.The surgical related indicators(wound healing,use of antibiotics,length of hospital stay),inflammatory factors[interleukin-8(IL-8),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin-6(IL-6)]levels,hand function scores,and incidence of complications between the two groups were compared.Results The observation group had shorter wound healing time,antibiotic use time,and hospital stay compared to the control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no significant difference in IL-8,TNF-α and IL-6 levels between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the levels of IL-8,TNF-α and IL-6 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no significant difference in hand function scores between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the score of hand function in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group(2.56%,2/39)was lower than that in the control group(23.08%,9/39),and the difference was significant(P<0.05).Conclusions Compared with thoracoabdominal pedicled flap repair,perforator flap repair is more effective,which can improve hand function,accelerate recovery,reduce inflammation level and the risk of complications.

Hand trauma soft tissue defectThoracoabdominal pedicle flap repairRepair of perforator flapHand functionInflammatory factorsComplication

刘东博、胡洪良、沈卫军、王战磊、闫纪涛、龚俊武、刘海洋、赵永超

展开 >

河南省漯河市第二人民医院显微手足外科 462000

手外伤软组织缺损 胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术 穿支皮瓣修复术 手功能 炎性因子 并发症

2024

临床医学
中华医学会河南分会

临床医学

影响因子:0.906
ISSN:1003-3548
年,卷(期):2024.44(5)
  • 5