首页|硬化剂注射联合内镜下套扎术治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的效果

硬化剂注射联合内镜下套扎术治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的效果

扫码查看
目的 探讨硬化剂注射联合内镜下套扎术对肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血(EGVB)患者的疗效。方法 选取2020年10月至2023年10月焦作市人民医院收治的80例肝硬化合并EGVB患者为研究对象。根据随机数字表法分为对照组与研究组,每组40例。对照组采用内镜下套扎术治疗,研究组采用硬化剂注射联合内镜下套扎术治疗。比较两组治疗总有效率、止血用时、输血量、住院天数、静脉曲张复发率、再出血率、病死率、门静脉压(PPV)、门静脉内径(DPV)、门静脉流速(VPV)及并发症发生率。结果 研究组治疗总有效率(95。00%,38/40)高于对照组(80。00%,32/40),差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。研究组止血用时、输血量均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05),两组住院天数比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0。05)。随访6个月期间,研究组静脉曲张复发率(10。00%,4/40)低于对照组(27。50%,11/40),差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);两组再出血率、病死率比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0。05)。治疗后,两组血清GAS、MTL水平均降低,且研究组明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。对照组并发症总发生率(15。00%,6/40)与研究组(17。50%,7/40)比较,差异未见统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 硬化剂注射联合内镜下套扎术相较于内镜下套扎术在治疗肝硬化合并EGVB患者中表现出更好的治疗效果,包括更高的治疗总有效率、较短的止血用时、较少的输血量、更低的静脉曲张复发率以及改善更明显的胃肠激素水平。
Effect of sclerosing agent injection combined with endoscopic variceal ligation on liver cirrhosis complicated by esophageal and gastric fundus variceal bleeding
Objective To investigate the efficacy of sclerotherapy injection combined with endoscopic variceal ligation on liver cirrhosis complicated by esophageal and gastric fundus variceal bleeding(EGVB).Methods Eighty patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with EGVB admitted to Jiaozuo People's Hospital from October 2020 to October 2023 were selected as the research subjects.They were divided into a control group and a study group according to the random number table method,with 40 cases in each group.The control group received endoscopic ligation treatment,and the study group used sclerotherapy injection combined with endoscopic ligation for treatment.The treatment efficacy,hemostasis time,transfusion volume,length of hospital stay,variceal recurrence rate,rebleeding rate,mortality rate,portal vein pressure(PPV),portal vein diameter(DPV),portal vein flow velocity(VPV),and incidence of complications between the two groups were compared.Results The total effective rate of treatment in the study group(95.00%,38/40)was higher than that in the control group(80.00%,32/40),and the difference was significant(P<0.05).The study group had less hemostatic time and transfusion volume than the control group,and the difference was significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05).During the 6-month follow-up period,the recurrence rate of varicose veins in the study group(10.00%,4/40)was lower than that in the control group(27.50%,11/40),and the difference was significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the rebleeding rate and mortality rate between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the serum GAS and MTL levels in both groups decreased,and those of the study group was significantly lower than those of the control group,with significant difference(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the control group(15.00%,6/40)and the study group(17.50%,7/40)(P>0.05).Conclusions Sclerotherapy injection combined with endoscopic variceal ligation shows better therapeutic effects than endoscopic variceal ligation in the treatment of liver cirrhosis complicated by EGVB,including higher treatment efficiency,shorter hemostasis time,less blood transfusion,lower variceal recurrence rate,and better improvement of gastrointestinal hormone levels.

Liver cirrhosisEsophagogastric fundus veinVariceal bleedingEndoscopic ligationSclerosing agent

王娅菲、郑梦丹、耿天祥

展开 >

河南省焦作市人民医院消化内科 454000

河南省焦作市人民医院内窥镜室 454000

河南省焦作市人民医院胃肠外科 454000

肝硬化 食管胃底静脉 静脉曲张破裂出血 内镜下套扎术 硬化剂

2024

临床医学
中华医学会河南分会

临床医学

影响因子:0.906
ISSN:1003-3548
年,卷(期):2024.44(7)