首页|右美托咪定对老年腹腔镜结肠癌根治术患者免疫保护及血微循环转移影响的临床观察

右美托咪定对老年腹腔镜结肠癌根治术患者免疫保护及血微循环转移影响的临床观察

Clinical observation of the effect of dexmedetomidine on immune protection and blood microcirculation metastasis in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer

扫码查看
目的 探讨右美托咪定对老年腹腔镜结肠癌根治术患者免疫保护及血微循环转移的影响.方法 选取2021 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月在上海市第七人民医院 78 例行腹腔镜结肠癌根治术患者为研究对象,随机分为 2 组,其中试验组(n=39)于麻醉诱导前采用右美托咪定复合喷他佐辛,对照组(n=39)采用等速率等量生理盐水以及喷他佐辛.比较两组围麻醉期指标,分别于麻醉诱导前(T0)、手术结束即刻(T1)、术后 30 min(T2)、术后 6 h(T3)比较患者血流动力学指标变化,于麻醉诱导前(T0)、术后 6 h(T3)、24 h(T4)、48 h(T5)对患者免疫功能及血微循环转移进行评估,并比较两组术后不良反应发生率.结果 试验组呛咳评分为(2.02±0.36)分、对照组呛咳评分为(2.61±0.49)分;试验组躁动评分为(1.66±0.21)分、对照组躁动评分为(2.07±0.35)分;差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组患者T0时刻HR、SpO2 及MAP比较差异无统计学意义P>0.05),T2时刻实验组HR显著低于对照组(76.38±7.33 vs.95.64±9.32),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);T1、T2 时刻试验组MAP显著低于对照组(73.84±7.94 vs.106.85±10.37,80.37±8.39 vs.102.84±9.38),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).T3~T5时间点,两组CD3+、CD4+及CD4+/CD8+均低于T0,试验组各指标均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).T0 时刻,两组CK19、CK20 阳性率比较无差异(P>0.05);T3~T5,试验组CK19、CK20 阳性率均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).对照组、试验组不良反应发生率分别为 15.4%和 10.4%.结论 右美托咪定可优化老年腹腔镜结肠癌根治术围麻醉期指标,有效减轻免疫抑制,降低血微循环转移风险,且安全性良好,值得临床进一步应用.
Objective To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on immune protection and blood microcirculation metastasis in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer.Methods Seventy-eight patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for colon cancer in Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital from June 2021 to June 2023 were selected as the study subjects,and were randomly divided into 2 groups.The experimental group(n=39)received dexmedetomidine combined with pentazocine before anesthesia induction,and the control group(n=39)received equal rate and amount of normal saline combined with pentazocine.The perianesthetic indexes of the two groups were compared before anesthesia induction(T0),immediately after surgery(T1),30 min after surgery(T2)and 6 h after surgery(T3),respectively.The immune function and blood microcirculation metastasis were evaluated before anesthesia induction(T0),6 h(T3),24 h(T4),48 h(T5),and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was compared between the two groups.Results The cough scores of the experimental group and the control group were 2.02±0.36 points and 2.61±0.49 points.The scores of agitation in experimental group were 1.66±0.21 points and 2.07±0.35 points in control group.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in HR,SpO2 and MAP between the two groups at T0(P>0.05),and HR in the experimental group at T2 was significantly lower than that in the control group(76.38±7.33 vs.95.64±9.32),the difference being statistically significant(P<0.05).MAP of test group was significantly lower than that of control group at T1 and T2(73.84±7.94 vs.106.85±10.37,80.37±8.39 vs.102.84±9.38),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).At T3-T5 time points,CD3+,CD4+and CD4+/CD8+in both groups were lower than T0,and all indexes in test group were lower than those in control group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).At T0,there was no difference in the positive rates of CK19 and CK20 between the two groups(P>0.05).The positive rates of CK19 and CK20 in T3-T5 test groups were lower than those in control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in control group and experimental group was 15.4%and 10.4%,respectively.Conclusion Dexmedetomidine can optimize the perianaesthetic indexes of laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer in the elderly,effectively alleviate immunosuppression and reduce the risk of blood microcirculation metastasis,and it is safe and worthy of further clinical application.

Colon cancerLaparoscopyRadical resectionDexmedetomidineImmune protectionBlood microcirculation metastases

张瑜、庄琳、孙海峰、王晶

展开 >

200136 上海 上海市第七人民医院麻醉科

结肠癌 腹腔镜 根治术 右美托咪定 免疫保护 血微循环转移

上海市浦东新区卫生健康委员会面上项目

PW2020A-41

2024

临床肿瘤学杂志
解放军第八一医院

临床肿瘤学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.583
ISSN:1009-0460
年,卷(期):2024.29(6)
  • 10