首页|立体定向放疗与射频消融治疗肝细胞癌疗效与安全性的Meta分析

立体定向放疗与射频消融治疗肝细胞癌疗效与安全性的Meta分析

扫码查看
目的 系统评价立体定向放疗(SBRT)与射频消融(RFA)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效与安全性.方法 检索国内外数据库,按照纳入、排除标准筛选文献,提取数据后采用Review Manager 5.3 软件进行Meta分析,比较两种治疗方法的疗效及安全性.结果 共纳入文献11 篇,Meta分析结果表明,SBRT组和RFA组的HCC患者在1 年总生存率(OS)、2 年OS方面的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而SBRT组的3 年OS低于RFA组(P<0.05).两组患者的2 年局部控制率(LCR)的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而SBRT组的 3 年LCR优于RFA组(P<0.05).在并发症方面,两组患者的 3 级以上副反应的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 在HCC治疗上RFA的生存获益较好,而SBRT有较好的局部控制效果,两种治疗方式的并发症发生率均较低,具有良好的安全性.
Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiotherapy(SBRT)and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)for hepatocellular carcinoma.Methods Literatures were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.Data was predefined and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 software to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of the two treatments.Results A total of 11 articles were retrieved.Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in 1-year overall survival(OS)and 2-year OS between SBRT group and RFA group(P>0.05).It was found that the 3-year OS of SBRT group was lower than the RFA group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in 2-year local control rate(LCR)between the two groups(P>0.05),while the 3-year LCR of SBRT group was better than the RFA group(P<0.05).In terms of complications,there was no significant difference in grade 3 or above side effects between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion RFA has a better survival benefit in HCC treatment,while SBRT has a better local control effect.Both treatment regimes have a lower incidence of complications and good safety.

Hepatocellular carcinomaStereotactic body radiation therapyRradiofrequency ablationMeta-analysis

陈佳海、陈珊珊、吴婉萍、黄德钦、张江灵、陈云萍

展开 >

362000 福建泉州 中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九一〇医院肿瘤科

肝细胞癌 立体定向放疗 射频消融 Meta分析

2024

临床肿瘤学杂志
解放军第八一医院

临床肿瘤学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.583
ISSN:1009-0460
年,卷(期):2024.29(7)