首页|书写的错位:略论司马迁笔下的"法家"

书写的错位:略论司马迁笔下的"法家"

扫码查看
司马迁对"法家"的认识是"法家"认识史上的重要阶段,应结合其父司马谈的定义(内涵)和《史记》本身的书写(外延)来界定.将法家诸子作为传主看待,《史记》的书写有独传、合传、家传三种类型.独传类型中,对商鞅的书写显示出了典型的法家特征,对李斯的书写法家色彩则显得略逊.合传类型中,对韩非与吴起的书写具有法家色彩,申不害、李悝、慎到等人似未被司马迁纳入法家.家传类型中,子产亦未被纳入法家.司马迁对法家的书写在一定程度上补全了司马谈对法家的定义,具有偏传主的倾向,但却显示出了历史书写与思想史书写的错位,具有重要的学术史意义.
Malposition of Writing:Discussions About Legalists Written by Sima Qian
Sima Qian's understanding of the"Legalists"is an important stage in the history of the understanding of the"Legalists",and should be defined in relation to his father Sima Tan's definition(connotation)and the writing of the Shij i itself(extension).Treating the members of the Legalists as biographees,the Shij i presents three types:sole biographiees,joint biographiees,and family biographiees.In the sole type,the writing of Shang Yang shows the typical characteristics of the Legalists,while Li Si's is slightly less obvious.In the combined type,the writing of Han Fei and Wu Qi have more legalist colors,while the writing of Shen Buhai,Li Kui,and Shen Dao do not seem to be included in Sima Qian's list of legalists.In the family biographies,Zi Chan is also not included.Sima Qian's writing on the Legalists completes Sima Tan's definition of the Legalists to a certain extent,and has an inclination to biographees,but it shows a mismatch between the writing of history and the history of ideas,which is of great significance in academic history.

Sima QianShij iLegalistshistory writing

石洪波

展开 >

天津师范大学 历史文化学院,天津 300387

司马迁 《史记》 法家 历史书写

2024

廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版)
廊坊师范学院

廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版)

影响因子:0.167
ISSN:1674-3210
年,卷(期):2024.40(1)
  • 37