首页|替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗CYP2 C19等位基因功能缺失急性冠状动脉综合征合并糖尿病患者安全性及有效性比较

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗CYP2 C19等位基因功能缺失急性冠状动脉综合征合并糖尿病患者安全性及有效性比较

扫码查看
目的 比较替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗CYP2C19 等位基因功能缺失急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)合并糖尿病(DM)患者的安全性及有效性。方法 选取北部战区总医院心血管内科自2016 年3 月至2017 年3 月收治的750 例CYP2C19 等位基因功能缺失的ACS合并DM患者为研究对象。根据应用P2Y12 抑制剂种类将患者分为氯吡格雷组(n=439)与替格瑞洛组(n=311)。记录并比较两组患者的基线资料、手术资料、出院用药情况,以及 12 个月内终点事件发生情况。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析绘制终点事件的风险曲线。结果 倾向性评分匹配前,替格瑞洛组患者年龄及高血压、既往脑卒中比例均低于氯吡格雷组,男性、左主干、左前降支比例及肌酐清除率均高于氯吡格雷组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05);两组患者吸烟情况比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。倾向性评分匹配后,替格瑞洛组与氯吡格雷组患者各项基线资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05);替格瑞洛组患者缺血事件、全因死亡、卒中发生率低于氯吡格雷组,出血学术研究联合会(BARC)3~5 型出血发生率高于氯吡格雷组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,倾向性评分匹配后,替格瑞洛组患者缺血事件发生率低于氯吡格雷组,BARC 3~5 型出血事件发生率高于氯吡格雷组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 与氯吡格雷比较,应用替格瑞洛治疗CYP2C19 等位基因功能缺失的ACS合并DM患者缺血事件发生率降低,出血事件发生率增加。
Safety and efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in the treatment of CYP2C19 allele-deficient acute coronary syndrome with diabetes mellitus
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the treatment of CYP2C19 allele-deficient a-cute coronary syndrome(ACS)complicated with diabetes mellitus(DM).Methods A total of 750 patients with ACS and DM with CYP2C19 allele loss admitted to the Department of Cardiology of General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from March 2016 to March 2017 were selected as the study objects.Patients were divided into clopidogrel group(n=439)and ticagrelor group(n=311)ac-cording to the type of P2Y12 inhibitor used.Baseline data,surgical data,discharge medication,and endpoint events within 12 months were recorded and compared between the two groups.Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to plot the risk curve of the end event.Results Before propensity score matching,age,hypertension and previous stroke rates in ticagrelor group were lower than those in clo-pidogrel group,and the proportions of male,left main branch,left anterior descending branch and creatinine clearance were higher than those in clopidogrel group,with statistical significance(P<0.05),and there was statistical significance in smoking status between the two groups(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in baseline data between ticagrelor group and clopidogrel group(P>0.05).After matching the propensity score,the incidence of ischemic events,all-cause death and stroke in ticagrelor group was lower than that in clopidogrel group,and the incidence of bleeding academic research consortium(BARC)type 3-5 hemorrhage was higher than that in clopidogrel group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that after matching the propensity score,the incidence of ischemic events in ticagrelor group was lower than that in clopidogrel group,and the incidence of BARC type 3-5 bleeding events was higher than that in clopidogrel group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion Com-pared with clopidogrel,the incidence of ischemic events is reduced and the incidence of bleeding events is increased in patients with ACS and DM who are treated with CYP2C19 allele loss using ticagrelor.

Dual antiplatelet therapyAcute coronary syndromeDiabetes mellitusCYP2C19 allele

田浩甫、裘淼涵、祁子钊、惠曼、党丹、徐晓彤、李晶、李毅、韩雅玲

展开 >

北部战区总医院 心血管内科,辽宁 沈阳 110016

锦州医科大学,辽宁 锦州 121001

双联抗血小板治疗 急性冠状动脉综合征 糖尿病 CYP2C19等位基因

国家重点研发计划国家重点研发计划

2022YFC25035002022YFC2503504

2024

临床军医杂志
解放军沈阳军区卫生人员训练基地

临床军医杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.465
ISSN:1671-3826
年,卷(期):2024.52(5)
  • 15