首页|大数据侵权证明责任分配:法治化国家治理视角下的完善策略

大数据侵权证明责任分配:法治化国家治理视角下的完善策略

扫码查看
相较于传统侵权理论构建的法律关系,大数据侵权的侵权主体、侵权行为、损害结果均更为复杂多变,导致因果关系的证明和判断陷入困境,不利于侵权法权利救济功能的发挥.基于个人信息主体证明能力相对薄弱的情况,根据技术依赖性标准、风险控制责任标准,结合事实推定规则,在沿用规范说分配证明责任的同时,应对特定情形采用证明责任倒置的分配方式.
Allocation of Burden of Proof in Big Data Infringement:Improvement Strategies from the Perspective of Rule of Law in National Governance
Compared with the legal relationships constructed by traditional tort theories,the subjects,acts,and damage outcomes of big data infringement are more complex and variable.This complexity complicates the proof and judgment of causality,hindering the remedial function of tort law.Given the relatively weak ability of individuals to provide proof,and based on standards of technological dependency and risk control responsibility,along with the rules of factual presumption,it is advisable to adopt a reversed burden of proof in specific situations while continuing to apply the normative approach for allocating the burden of proof.

big data infringementcausalityburden of proofevaluation criteria

齐恩平

展开 >

天津商业大学法学院

大数据侵权 因果关系 证明责任 判断标准

2024

理论与现代化
天津市社会科学界联合会

理论与现代化

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.354
ISSN:1003-1502
年,卷(期):2024.(6)