首页|离子选择电极法和离子色谱法测定空气中氟化氢的方法学比较

离子选择电极法和离子色谱法测定空气中氟化氢的方法学比较

扫码查看
采用GBZ/T 160.36-2004《工作场所空气有毒物质测定 氟化物》的要求采样,并分别用离子选择电极法和离子色谱法进行实际样品方法学分析,建立通过水质常用色谱柱AS19测定空气中氟化氢的色谱条件.结果表明:离子选择电极法在0.0~2.0 μg/mL范围内线性良好,r=0.999 5,精密度在0.49%~1.47%,加标回收率在94.9%~103.3%;而离子色谱法在AS19为色谱柱、淋洗液浓度为35 mmol/L、流速为1.0 mL/min时能得到较好的结果,0.0~3.0 µg/mL范围内线性良好,r=0.999 8,精密度在0.35%~1.28%,加标回收率在95.6%~103.2%.两种方法回收率比较无统计学意义(t=0.52,P=0.31),P>0.05.两种方法均可用于空气中氟化氢的测定,相比之下,离子色谱法具有仪器操作与样品采样及处理简便、选择性好、效率高的特点,更适合于空气中氟化氢的大批量测定.
The Methods for Determination of Fluorides in the Air of Workplace(GBZ/T 160.36-2004)was used to sample the toxic substance fluoride in the workplace and two methods of ion selective electrode method and ion chromatography method were used to analyze the actual samples,to establish the chromatographic conditions for the determination of hydrogen fluoride in air by water quality column AS19.The results show:in the range of 0.0-2.0μ g/mL,the linearity of ion-selective electrode method was good,R=0.999 5,the precision was 0.49%-1.47%,the recovery rate was 94.9%-103.3%,when the concentration of eluent was 35 mmol/L and the flow rate was 1.0 mUmin,the linearity was good in the range of 0.0-3.0 μ g/mL,r=0.999 8,the precision was 0.35%-1.28%,the recoveries were 95.6%-103.2%.There was no significant difference between the two methods(t=0.52,P=0.31),P>0.05.Both of the two methods can be used for the determination of hydrogen fluoride in air.In contrast,ion chromatography has the characteristics of simple operation,good selectivity and high efficiency,more suitable for the determination of hydrogen fluoride in air in large quantities.

ion selective electrode methodion chromatographyhydrogen fluorideworkplaceenvironment

麦麦提艾力·依甘拜尔迪、祖力乎马尔·艾海提、阿卜杜乃比·艾比布拉、美合日班·努尔麦麦提

展开 >

和田地区疾病预防控制中心,新疆和田 848000

新疆维吾尔自治区疾病预防控制中心,新疆乌鲁木齐 830002

离子选择电极法 离子色谱法 氟化氢 工作场所 环境

2024

环境保护与循环经济
辽宁环境科学研究院 辽宁省环境科学学会

环境保护与循环经济

影响因子:0.424
ISSN:1674-1021
年,卷(期):2024.44(11)