首页|股权代持执行异议之诉的裁判规则探析

股权代持执行异议之诉的裁判规则探析

扫码查看
在股权代持情形下,实际出资人能否阻却人民法院依名义股东债权人的申请对股权的强制执行,在理论界与司法实践中均存在较大争议.案外人对执行标的享有的权益是否足以排除强制执行,应根据该权益的性质进行分析.在股权代持模式中,实际出资人对执行标的享有的权利性质应为债权.同时,名义股东债权人的信赖利益应当得到法律保护.基于利益平衡与社会效果的考量,实际出资人原则上不能排除强制执行,但对实际出资人执行前取得人民法院确权判决,申请执行人明知股权代持等特殊情形,应当准许实际出资人排除执行.
Analysis of the judgment rules for litigation against execution of share-holding entrustment
In the case of share-holding entrustment,whether the actual investor can prevent the people's court from enforcing the equity based on the application of the nominal shareholder and creditor is a matter of great controversy in both theoretical circles and judicial practice.Whether the rights and interests enjoyed by a party outside the case in the subject matter of execution are sufficient to exclude compulsory execution should be ana-lyzed based on the nature of the rights and interests.In the model of share-holding entrustment,the nature of the rights enjoyed by the actual investor over the subject matter of execution should be creditor's rights.At the same time,the trust interests of nominal shareholders and creditors should be protected by law.Based on the considera-tion of the balance of interests and social effects,the actual investor cannot exclude compulsory execution in prin-ciple.However,if the actual investor obtains a judgment confirming the rights of the people's court before execu-tion,or the person applying for execution is aware of share-holding entrustment,the actual investor should be al-lowed to exclude the execution.

share-holding entrustmentactual investorlitigation against execution

勾雪峰

展开 >

辽宁省沈阳市中级人民法院,辽宁 沈阳 110013

股权代持 实际出资人 执行异议之诉

2024

辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报
辽宁公安司法管理干部学院

辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.141
ISSN:1009-1416
年,卷(期):2024.(4)