首页|数字安全视角下侵犯虚拟货币的刑法定性与财产处置

数字安全视角下侵犯虚拟货币的刑法定性与财产处置

扫码查看
针对实践中侵犯虚拟货币行为的刑法定性,审判实务中的裁判结果莫衷一是.刑法理论虽陆续提出了"计算机犯罪说""财产性犯罪说"和"秩序性区分说"三种不同方案,但均存在一定疑问.解决侵犯虚拟货币的行为定性问题,应当充分考察我国关于虚拟货币的前置性规范文件,考量其数字安全保护视野的确立.以虚拟货币为规范对象的前置法,应将其界定为违禁品而排斥于普通虚拟财产的刑法保护客体之外.解决上述问题,应当独立建构刑法规制方案,参照侵犯违禁品的财产犯罪路径对其予以定性;难以查清货币价值时,可依照情节定罪量刑.同时,根据法秩序统一原理的要求,对于涉案财产处置应采用国家没收的方案,而不应返还给被害人.
Criminal characterization and property disposal of infringement of virtual currency from the perspective of digital security
Regarding the criminal characterization of acts that infringe virtual currency in practice,the judgment results in trial practice are inconsistent.Although criminal law theory has successively proposed three different so-lutions,namely"computer crime theory","property crime theory"and"order distinction theory",there are cer-tain doubts in all of them.To solve the problem of characterization of acts that infringe virtual currency,we should fully examine China's pre-regulatory documents on virtual currency and consider the establishment of its digital security protection vision.Pre-regulatory laws that regulate virtual currency should define it as contraband and exclude it from the protection objects of ordinary virtual property in criminal law.To solve the above prob-lems,we should independently construct a criminal law regulation plan and characterize it by referring to the property crime path of infringing contraband;when it is difficult to ascertain the value of the currency,the convic-tion and sentencing can be based on the circumstances.At the same time,according to the principle of unity of le-gal order,the property involved in the case should be confiscated by the state,but not be returned to the victim.

infringement of virtual currencydigital securitycriminal characterizationproperty disposal

唐岚敕、刘浩

展开 >

清华大学,北京 100084

侵犯虚拟货币 数字安全 刑法定性 财产处置

2024年四川省犯罪防控研究中心课题

FZFK24-09

2024

辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报
辽宁公安司法管理干部学院

辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.141
ISSN:1009-1416
年,卷(期):2024.(4)