首页|内蒙古阴山北麓地区不同品系藜麦防风效果研究

内蒙古阴山北麓地区不同品系藜麦防风效果研究

扫码查看
对内蒙古阴山北麓地区不同品系藜麦采用人工栽培的方法,利用HOBO数采仪观测灌浆期和成熟期藜麦田在不同株距和行距配置下的防风效果。结果表明:①在不同株距下,不同品系藜麦田,防风效能随着背风面的距离增大而减小,防风效能随着株距增大而减小,成熟期防风效能均大于灌浆期,比灌浆期高4。02%,WD-9藜麦防风效能为8。63%~68。83%,比灌浆期高9。28%,W-7藜麦防风效能为2。14%~56。46%,比灌浆期高15。12%。②在不同株距下,地表粗糙度的变化规律与防风效能相同,比灌浆期藜麦田后1H处平均粗糙度高0。65 cm。灌浆期WD-9藜麦粗糙度最大为6。73 cm,W-19藜麦粗糙度最小为2。79 cm,成熟期WD-9藜麦田粗糙度最大为7。50 cm,W-19藜麦田粗糙度最小为3。56 cm。③在不同行距下,不同品系藜麦田,成熟期防风效能均大于灌浆期,均在藜麦田后1H处达到最大,其中WD-9藜麦田后1H处的防风效能为76。44%~69。89%,比灌浆期高10。48%。藜麦田背风面0H~5H,防风效能均随着行距的增大而降低,平均防风效能比灌浆期高5。71%,藜麦田背风面7H~9H,防风效能均随着行距的增大而提高,平均防风效能比灌浆期高2。00%。④在不同株距下,地表粗糙度的变化规律与防风效能相同,在背风面1H处粗糙度最大,其中WD-9藜麦平均粗糙度最大为10。91 cm,比灌浆期增大0。98 cm,W-19藜麦平均粗糙度最小为6。88 cm,比灌浆期减小0。42 cm。藜麦田背风面0H~5H,粗糙度随着行距的增大而降低,比灌浆期高10。48%,藜麦田背风面7H~9H,粗糙度随着行距的增大而提高,比灌浆期高10。48%。不同品系藜麦中WD-9藜麦在不同配置条件下均可以有更好的防风效果。
Study on the Windproof Effect of Different Strains of Quinoa in the Northern Foothills of Yinshan Inner Mongolia
Different strains of quinoa were artificially cultivated in the northern foothills of Yinshan,Inner Mon-golia.The HOBO data acquisition instrument was used to observe the windproof effect of quinoa fields during the filling and mature stages under different plant spacing and row spacing configurations.The results showed that:① under different plant spacing,the wind prevention efficiency of different strains of quinoa fields decreased with the increase of leeward distance,and the wind prevention efficiency decreased with the increase of plant spacing.The wind prevention efficiency in the mature stage was greater than that in the filling stage,which was 4.02%higher than that in the filling stage.The wind prevention efficiency of WD-9 quinoa was 8.63%~68.83%,which was 9.28%higher than that in the filling stage.The wind prevention efficiency of W-7 quinoa was 2.14%~56.46%,which was 15.12%higher than that in the filling stage.② Under different plant spacing,the variation pat-tern of surface roughness is the same as the wind prevention efficiency,which is 0.65cm higher than the average roughness at 1 hour after the filling period in quinoa fields.The maximum roughness of WD-9 quinoa during the filling period is 6.73cm,and the minimum roughness of W-19 quinoa is 2.79 cm.The maximum roughness of WD-9 quinoa field during the mature period is 7.50 cm,and the minimum roughness of W-19 quinoa field is 3.56 cm.③ Under different row spacing,the wind prevention efficiency of different varieties of quinoa fields is greater during the mature stage than during the filling stage,and reaches its maximum at the last 1 hour of the quinoa field.Among them,the wind prevention efficiency of WD-9 quinoa field at the last 1 hour is 76.44%~69.89%,which is 10.48%higher than during the filling stage.The windproof efficiency of the leeward surface in quinoa fields decreases with increasing row spacing from 0H to 5H,and the average windproof efficiency is 5.71%higher than that during the grouting period.The windproof efficiency of the leeward surface in quinoa fields increases with increasing row spacing from 7H to 9H,and the average windproof efficiency is 2.00%higher than that dur-ing the grouting period.④ Under different plant spacing,the variation pattern of surface roughness is the same as the wind prevention efficiency.The roughness is highest at 1H on the leeward side.Among them,the average roughness of WD-9 quinoa is the highest at 10.91 cm,which is 0.98 cm higher than the grouting period.The aver-age roughness of W-19 quinoa is the lowest at 6.88 cm,which is 0.42 cm lower than the grouting period.The roughness of the leeward surface in quinoa fields decreases with increasing row spacing from 0H to 5H,which is 10.48%higher than that during the filling period.The roughness of the leeward surface in quinoa fields increases with increasing row spacing from 7H to 9H,which is 10.48%higher than that during the filling period.WD-9 qui-noa in different strains can have better windproof effects under different configuration conditions.

quinoawindproof effectthe northern foothills of the Yinshan Mountains in Inner Mongoliasurface roughness

杨广源、郭占斌、刘瑞香、王树彦、陈琦、王建瑞、高万隆

展开 >

内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010029

荒漠生态系统保护与修复国家林业和草原局重点实验室,内蒙古呼和浩特 010029

内蒙古益稷生物科技有限公司,内蒙古呼和浩特 010019

内蒙古蒙农藜麦产业研究院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010010

内蒙古自治区第二林业和草原监测规划院,内蒙古乌兰浩特 137400

展开 >

藜麦 防风效果 内蒙古阴山北麓地区 地表粗糙度

呼和浩特市应用技术研究与开发资金项目呼和浩特市应用技术研究与开发资金项目中央引导地方科技发展资金项目内蒙古自治区燕麦藜麦产业技术创新推广体系

2022—农—52023—农—12022ZY0138

2024

绿色科技
花木盆景杂志社

绿色科技

影响因子:0.365
ISSN:1674-9944
年,卷(期):2024.26(10)