首页|基于手持激光雷达与架站激光雷达的林木调查对比研究

基于手持激光雷达与架站激光雷达的林木调查对比研究

扫码查看
为验证手持LiDAR和架站LiDAR在不同林地类型条件下的适用性,提高森林资源调查的效率与精度。以浙江农林大学周边林地为研究区域,根据地形坡度、林下灌木情况,以及林分密度等因素设置3块代表性样地,综合对比两种扫描方式的时间效率、所获点云质量、单木分割与参数提取的精度。结果表明:手持LiDAR扫描时间效率为架站LiDAR的2倍以上,但所得单木点云表现出较大的噪点;缓坡地形条件下,基于架站LiDAR获取的点云数据,80%以上的单木胸径闭合度大于等于50%,高于手持LiDAR;相同样地条件下,基于两种扫描方式所得点云单木自动分割精度趋于一致,均在75%以上;架站LiDAR点云数据提取胸径的均方根误差(1。499~1。774 cm)小于手持LiDAR,而架站LiDAR点云数据提取树高的均方根误差(1。439~1。953 m)大于手持LiDAR。手持LiDAR和架站LiDAR对于单木参数提取均具有较好的效果,其中手持LiDAR扫描效率高但精度略低于架站LiDAR,架站Li-DAR 点云数据能更有效地反映树木形态,但作业效率较低。
Comparative Study of Forest Survey Based on Handheld LiDAR and Terrestrial Laser Scanning
In order to verify the applicability of handheld LiDAR and terrestrial laser scanning under different for-est types and improve the efficiency and accuracy of forest resource survey,the forest land around Zhejiang Agri-cultural and Forestry University was taken as the study area.Three representative plots were set according to dif-ferent factors,including terrain slope,understory shrubs,and stand density.The time efficiency,point cloud quali-ty,and accuracy of single tree segmentation and parameter extraction of the two scanning modes were comprehen-sively compared.The results showed that the scanning time of handheld LiDAR was more than twice that of ter-restrial laser scanning,but the single-tree point cloud obtained showed large noises.Under gentle slope terrain conditions,more than 80%of trees have a point cloud closure at breast height ≥50%when terrestrial laser scan-ning was used,which was relatively higher than that of handheld LiDAR.Under the same conditions,the point cloud single tree segmentation accuracy obtained by the two scanning methods tends to be consistent,both above 75%.For the extraction of breast diameter,the root mean square error corresponding(1.499~1.774 cm)to the ter-restrial laser scanning point cloud data was smaller than that of the handheld LiDAR,while for the extraction of tree height,the root mean square error corresponding(1.439~1.953 m)to the terrestrial laser scanning point cloud data was greater than that of the handheld LiDAR.Both handheld LiDAR and terrestrial laser scanning have good results in forestry research.Handheld LiDAR has high scanning efficiency but slightly lower accuracy than mounted LiDAR.Terrestrial laser scanning point cloud data can more effectively reflect tree morphology but has low operating efficiency.

handheld LiDARterrestrial laser scanningindividual tree segmentationindividual tree parameter extraction

岳元征、邓愫愫、余世超、刘航

展开 >

浙江农林大学环境与资源学院、碳中和学院,浙江杭州 311300

手持LiDAR 架站LiDAR 单木分割 单木参数提取

2024

绿色科技
花木盆景杂志社

绿色科技

影响因子:0.365
ISSN:1674-9944
年,卷(期):2024.26(16)