Reflection and Perfection of Public Prosecution Review System in China:From the Perspective of Drawing Lessons from German Intermediate Procedure
Public prosecution review is of great significance in criminal proceedings.But China's public prosecution review system can't effectively play the role of screening cases,there are deficiencies in the control of public prosecution,and the level of rights protection of the prosecuted is low.In contrast,the German intermediate procedure has advantages in examination and screening,power restriction and rights protection.Taking it as a reference,in order to realize the litigation task of respecting and protecting human rights,to meet the requirements of the trial-centered litigation system reform,and to promote the implementation of the criminal policy of less arrest and more careful prosecution and detention,the right of objection should be given to the accused in the public prosecution review,the substantive review system of public prosecution cases should be constructed and the restraint mechanism of public prosecution right should be optimized.
public prosecution review systemintermediate proceduresubstantive examination