历史研究2024,Issue(2) :75-99.

明至清初卫所空间形态与地理志书书写

Spatial Pattern of the Garrisons and Writing of Geographical Treatises from Ming Dynasty to Early Qing

傅林祥
历史研究2024,Issue(2) :75-99.

明至清初卫所空间形态与地理志书书写

Spatial Pattern of the Garrisons and Writing of Geographical Treatises from Ming Dynasty to Early Qing

傅林祥1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 复旦大学历史地理研究中心
  • 折叠

摘要

明代地理志书编纂者按卫所驻地与府界的空间位置关系,将在外卫所分为两类:一类以府县体例进行记载,包括大部分边地卫所、驻守在土司境内且管辖土司的卫所;另一类被记载在府州、土司各卷"公署"等子目中,包括驻守在府县境内、驻守在土司境内但无隶属关系的卫所.随着军镇制形成,部分志书中的卫所管理区域被城堡管理区域替代.府县与卫所的空间差异主要在于属性不同,州县与实土卫所拥有政区空间,其他卫所只有行政空间.就此,州县与卫所、盐政等机构的实际管理区域形成了各自的权力空间.

Abstract

The compilers of the Ming Dynasty geographical treatises divided the garrisons(weisuo)located outside the central administration into two categories based on their spatial relationship with the jurisdictions of prefectures(fu).One category was recorded in the local chronicles of districts(xian),including most frontier garrisons and those stationed within native chieftain's domains with jurisdiction over them.The other category was documented under subheadings such as"Public Offices"in the volumes dedicated to prefectures,departments(zhou),and native chieftain's domains,including garrisons stationed within districts and those stationed within native chieftains'domains but without jurisdiction over them.With the establishment of the military town(junzhen)system,the administrative areas of some garrisons in the treatises were replaced by those of fortresses.The spatial differences between districts and garrisons primarily lie in their distinct attributes.Departments and districts,along with garrisons having territorial jurisdiction,possessed administrative spatial jurisdictions,while other garrisons only had administrative spatial authority.Consequently,the actual administrative areas of departments and districts,garrisons,and salt administration institutions formed their respective spheres of power.

关键词

明清/卫所/疆域/行政区划/地理志书

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
历史研究
中国社会科学院

历史研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.933
ISSN:0459-1909
参考文献量127
段落导航相关论文