摘要
17世纪末到19世纪初,德意志启蒙学界的中国知识生产形成五种论调:"互补论"、"一致论"、"多样论"、"停滞论"和"幼稚论".对此,学界常见的解释框架有三种:"东方主义"、"汉学主义"和"多元现代性".它们各有所长,但也存在认识局限."多源现代性"是从全球思想史角度提供的补充性解释框架,认为中欧文化相遇造成的思想交融覆盖了多种样态,德意志启蒙思想家的中国知识生产是一种复杂的"叠加态",现代性的起源和发展是某种"纠缠态".传统与现代交融、东西方贯通,是全球现代性起步的前提.
Abstract
Between the end of the 17th century and the beginning of the 19th,the German Enlightenment's pursuit of the production of knowledge about China resulted in the five distinct theories of Complementarity,Consensus,Diversity,Stagnation,and Naivety and the three common academic frameworks of Orientalism,Sinologism,and Multiple Modernities.Each has strengths and limitations,with an alternative framework.The perspective of modernities with multiple origins offers a global approach by positing that the intellectual integration resulting from the cultural encounter between China and Europe encompassed a variety of forms.When the thinkers of the German Enlightenment turned to China,it was with a complex superposition,with the origins and development of the modernities representing a kind of entangled state.In any case,the blending of traditional and modern elements and the interconnectedness of Eastern and Western cultures are prerequisites for the onset of global modernities.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据