首页|不同干物质含量对金艳猕猴桃果实品质和感官评价的影响

不同干物质含量对金艳猕猴桃果实品质和感官评价的影响

扫码查看
对金艳猕猴桃软熟果的干物质含量采用6个分级级别DM1-20.0%~21.0%;DM2-19.0%~20.0%;DM3-18.0%~19.0%;DM4-17.0%~18.0%;DM5-16.0%~17.0%;DM6-15.0%~16.0%,研究干物质含量与果实软熟品质和感官评价的关系.结果表明,随着干物质含量的降低,软熟果实中可溶性固形物含量从DM1级的17.34%逐渐下降至DM6级的12.01%;果汁总酸含量整体上逐渐升高;软熟时干物质含量与可溶性固形物含量高度正相关,相关系数r值为0.956;果实喜好度、芳香度、甜度和接受度之间高度正相关,而酸度与接受度之间高度负相关.软熟果干物质含量级别的DM1~3因具有较高的甜度和较低的酸度而更受消费者喜爱,DM6果实因口感偏酸而最不被消费者接受;果实感官评价结果与果实品质结果高度吻合.猕猴桃采收时的干物质含量在贮藏过程中基本保持不变,软熟时的干物质含量可以间接反映采收时的干物质含量.金艳果实被消费者喜爱和可接受的最低条件为干物质含量≥16.5%,软熟果可溶性固形物含量≥13.3%,果汁总酸≤0.21%.
Effects of dry matter content on fruit quality and sensory evaluation of Jinyan kiwifruit
Effects of six different classes of dry matter content,including DM1(20.0%~21.0%),DM2(19.0%~20.0%),DM3(18.0%~19.0%),DM4(17.0%~18.0%),DM5(16.0%~17.0%)and DM6(15.0%~16.0%)on fruit quality and sensory evaluation of Jinyan kiwifruit were studied.The results indicated that soluble solids content(SSC)in ripe fruit gradually decreased from the highest level of 17.34%in DM1 class to the lowest level of 12.01%in DM6 class with the decrease of dry matter content in DM classes,but the total acidity in juice basically gradually increased.SSC was highly positively correlated with the dry matter(r=0.956),the difference between them was approximately 3.3%.There was a high positive correlation among fruit overall liking,aroma intensity,sweetness and acceptance,but sourness showed a negative correla tion with them.The fruit with high dry matter content(DM1-3 classes)were more liked and ac-cepted by consumers because of high sweetness and low sourness,while the DM6 fruit with lowest level of dry matter were least liked and accepted by consumer due to more sourness.Moreover,the results of fruit sensory evaluation strongly agreed with the results of fruit qualities.The minimum conditions for consumers to accept Jinyan fruit were the dry matter content of over 16.5%,SSC for soft ripe fruits of over 13.3%,and total acid content of less than 0.21%for juice.

kiwifruitJinyandry matterfruit qualitysensory evaluation

黄文俊、王周倩、杨洁、张琦、钟彩虹

展开 >

中国科学院武汉植物园/中国科学院猕猴桃产业技术工程实验室,湖北武汉 430074

猕猴桃 金艳 干物质 果实品质 感官评价

2024

落叶果树
山东省果树研究所 山东农业大学园艺科学与工程学院 青岛农业大学园林园艺学院 山东省果茶技术指导站

落叶果树

影响因子:0.222
ISSN:1002-2910
年,卷(期):2024.56(5)