首页|基于美景度评价法的城市历史文化公园植物景观评价——以义乌骆宾王公园为例

基于美景度评价法的城市历史文化公园植物景观评价——以义乌骆宾王公园为例

扫码查看
通过对义乌骆宾王公园中的植物进行景观评价,分析其存在的不足,根据结果对公园中的植物景观营造提出建议.运用美景度评价(SBE)法对骆宾王公园中的植物景观样地进行量化研究.结果表明,1)6类植物景观样地的评价得分由高到低分别为滨水植物景观(0.302 6)、文化植物景观(0.2606)、建筑植物景观(-0.072 2)、入口植物景观(-0.107 0)、休憩植物景观(-0.162 1)、路旁植物景观(-0.177 1).2)从各样地的评价结果来看,得分最高的E4(枫香-西府海棠-鸡爪槭-无患子+沿阶草+紫藤+玉蝉花-荷花-菖蒲-黄莲花)和D1(香樟-银杏-苏铁-桂花+含笑花-花叶青木-南天竹+一叶兰-麦冬-沿阶草),得分分别为0.599 8和0.436 8,而D4样地(琼花-桂花+麦冬)在所有调查的样地中的得分最低,仅为-0.720 0.由此可见,植物种类的丰富性、层次搭配的合理性、群落结构的合理性是影响SBE值的重要因素.3)具有不同专业背景的评价人员,在植物景观评价的结果上具有一致性.在评价结果的基础上,针对6类不同样地提出改进建议,提升植物在色彩、种类和群落结构上的表现.
Study on the Evaluation of Plant Landscapes of Urban Historical and Cultural Parks Based on Scenic Beauty Evaluation Method:A Case Study of Luobinwang Park in Yiwu
This study evaluates the plant landscapes in Luobinwang Park in Yiwu,analyzes existing defi-ciencies,and proposes suggestions for improvement based on the results.The Scenic Beauty Evaluation method was applied to quantify plant landscape sample plots in Luobinwang Park.The results show that:1)The evaluation scores for the six types of plant landscape sample plots,from highest to lowest,are as follows:waterfront plant landscape(0.302 6),cultural plant landscape(0.260 6),architectural plant landscape(-0.072 2),entrance plant landscape(-0.107 0),recreational plant landscape(-0.162 1),and roadside plant landscape(-0.177 1).2)Among the evaluated plots,the highest scores were for E4(Liquidambar formosana-Malus micromalus-Acer palmatum-Koelreuteria panicu-lata+Liriope spicata+Wisteria sinensis+Campsis grandiflora-Nelumbo nucifera-Acorus calamus-Nuphar pumila)and D1(Cinnamomum camphora-Ginkgo biloba-Cycas revoluta-Osmanthus fragrans+Michelia figo-Aucuba japonica-Nandina domestica+Aspidistra elatior-Ophiopogon japonicus-Lir-iope spicata),with scores of 0.599 8 and 0.436 8 respectively.The D4 plot(Viburnum plicatum-Os-manthus fragrans+Ophiopogon japonicus)scored the lowest at-0.720 0.This indicates that the rich-ness of plant species,the rationality of layer matching,and the rationality of community structure are im-portant factors affecting the SBE values.3)Evaluators with different professional backgrounds showed consistency in the plant landscape evaluation results.Based on the evaluation results,improvement sug-gestions for the six types of sample plots were proposed to enhance the performance of plants in terms of color,species,and community structure.

Scenic Beauty Evaluation methodPlant landscape evaluationLuobinwang Park

贾书含、张建国

展开 >

湖州师范学院艺术学院,浙江湖州 313000

湖州师范学院经济管理学院,浙江湖州 313000

美景度评价法 植物景观评价 骆宾王

浙江省科技厅公益技术研究农业项目浙江大花园建设研究院专项课题(重点课题)湖州师范学院"两山"理念研究院2022年年度课题

2016C32017DHYA202008LSY2207

2024

林业勘查设计
黑龙江省森林资源管理局 黑龙江省森林经理学会

林业勘查设计

影响因子:0.178
ISSN:1673-4505
年,卷(期):2024.53(5)