林业勘查设计2024,Vol.53Issue(5) :59-67.

基于美景度评价法的城市历史文化公园植物景观评价——以义乌骆宾王公园为例

Study on the Evaluation of Plant Landscapes of Urban Historical and Cultural Parks Based on Scenic Beauty Evaluation Method:A Case Study of Luobinwang Park in Yiwu

贾书含 张建国
林业勘查设计2024,Vol.53Issue(5) :59-67.

基于美景度评价法的城市历史文化公园植物景观评价——以义乌骆宾王公园为例

Study on the Evaluation of Plant Landscapes of Urban Historical and Cultural Parks Based on Scenic Beauty Evaluation Method:A Case Study of Luobinwang Park in Yiwu

贾书含 1张建国2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 湖州师范学院艺术学院,浙江湖州 313000
  • 2. 湖州师范学院艺术学院,浙江湖州 313000;湖州师范学院经济管理学院,浙江湖州 313000
  • 折叠

摘要

通过对义乌骆宾王公园中的植物进行景观评价,分析其存在的不足,根据结果对公园中的植物景观营造提出建议.运用美景度评价(SBE)法对骆宾王公园中的植物景观样地进行量化研究.结果表明,1)6类植物景观样地的评价得分由高到低分别为滨水植物景观(0.302 6)、文化植物景观(0.2606)、建筑植物景观(-0.072 2)、入口植物景观(-0.107 0)、休憩植物景观(-0.162 1)、路旁植物景观(-0.177 1).2)从各样地的评价结果来看,得分最高的E4(枫香-西府海棠-鸡爪槭-无患子+沿阶草+紫藤+玉蝉花-荷花-菖蒲-黄莲花)和D1(香樟-银杏-苏铁-桂花+含笑花-花叶青木-南天竹+一叶兰-麦冬-沿阶草),得分分别为0.599 8和0.436 8,而D4样地(琼花-桂花+麦冬)在所有调查的样地中的得分最低,仅为-0.720 0.由此可见,植物种类的丰富性、层次搭配的合理性、群落结构的合理性是影响SBE值的重要因素.3)具有不同专业背景的评价人员,在植物景观评价的结果上具有一致性.在评价结果的基础上,针对6类不同样地提出改进建议,提升植物在色彩、种类和群落结构上的表现.

Abstract

This study evaluates the plant landscapes in Luobinwang Park in Yiwu,analyzes existing defi-ciencies,and proposes suggestions for improvement based on the results.The Scenic Beauty Evaluation method was applied to quantify plant landscape sample plots in Luobinwang Park.The results show that:1)The evaluation scores for the six types of plant landscape sample plots,from highest to lowest,are as follows:waterfront plant landscape(0.302 6),cultural plant landscape(0.260 6),architectural plant landscape(-0.072 2),entrance plant landscape(-0.107 0),recreational plant landscape(-0.162 1),and roadside plant landscape(-0.177 1).2)Among the evaluated plots,the highest scores were for E4(Liquidambar formosana-Malus micromalus-Acer palmatum-Koelreuteria panicu-lata+Liriope spicata+Wisteria sinensis+Campsis grandiflora-Nelumbo nucifera-Acorus calamus-Nuphar pumila)and D1(Cinnamomum camphora-Ginkgo biloba-Cycas revoluta-Osmanthus fragrans+Michelia figo-Aucuba japonica-Nandina domestica+Aspidistra elatior-Ophiopogon japonicus-Lir-iope spicata),with scores of 0.599 8 and 0.436 8 respectively.The D4 plot(Viburnum plicatum-Os-manthus fragrans+Ophiopogon japonicus)scored the lowest at-0.720 0.This indicates that the rich-ness of plant species,the rationality of layer matching,and the rationality of community structure are im-portant factors affecting the SBE values.3)Evaluators with different professional backgrounds showed consistency in the plant landscape evaluation results.Based on the evaluation results,improvement sug-gestions for the six types of sample plots were proposed to enhance the performance of plants in terms of color,species,and community structure.

关键词

美景度评价法/植物景观评价/骆宾王

Key words

Scenic Beauty Evaluation method/Plant landscape evaluation/Luobinwang Park

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

浙江省科技厅公益技术研究农业项目(2016C32017)

浙江大花园建设研究院专项课题(重点课题)(DHYA202008)

湖州师范学院"两山"理念研究院2022年年度课题(LSY2207)

出版年

2024
林业勘查设计
黑龙江省森林资源管理局 黑龙江省森林经理学会

林业勘查设计

影响因子:0.178
ISSN:1673-4505
段落导航相关论文