首页|技术人工物的实在主义辩护及其问题

技术人工物的实在主义辩护及其问题

扫码查看
哲学研究中有关技术人工物是否具有实在性地位的争论源于技术人工物的物质依赖性和意向依赖性两种特征之间的张力.部分学者试图基于功能的实在主义和基于类比的实在主义,通过消解或弱化技术人工物的意向依赖性来为它们的实在性辩护,但这两条路径窄化了技术人工物概念的内涵和解释范围,把自然种类与真实种类混为一谈,无法摆脱结构与功能之间的认识论鸿沟.突破心物二分的二元思维模式,用关系论重新审视技术人工物是解决这一问题的一个可能路径.
Debates about Reality of Technical Artifacts and Relevant Problems
The debate on whether technical artifacts have a reality status in philosophical research stems from the tension between the material dependence and the intentional dependence of technical artifacts.Some scholars try to defend the reality of technical artifacts by eliminating or weakening their intentional dependence based on re-alism based on function and realism based on analogy.However,these two approaches narrow the connotation and interpretation scope of the concept of technical artifacts,and confuse natural category with real category,which cannot get rid of the epistemological gap between structure and function.One possible approach to solve this prob-lem is to break through dualism based on the antinomy between mind and matter,and to reexamine technical arti-facts with the relationship theory.

technical artifactsrealismanti-realismmaterial dependenceintentional dependence

齐康

展开 >

中山大学 马克思主义学院,广东 广州 510275

技术人工物 实在主义 反实在主义 物质依赖性 意向依赖性

2024

洛阳师范学院学报
洛阳师范学院

洛阳师范学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.219
ISSN:1009-4970
年,卷(期):2024.43(12)