首页|乡村旅游发展对农户收入流动性的影响研究——基于CFPS的经验数据

乡村旅游发展对农户收入流动性的影响研究——基于CFPS的经验数据

扫码查看
促进机会公平、畅通向上流动通道是共同富裕的应有之义.文章基于2010-2018年5期中国家庭追踪调查面板数据,首先运用收入转换矩阵对农户收入流动性进行考察,继而构建有序概率单位模型实证检验了乡村旅游发展对农户收入流动性的影响,并进一步考察了该影响的异质性.研究有3点发现.1)2010-2018年农户收入流动性整体呈下降趋势.位于收入分布两端的农户阶层趋于固化;位于中间阶层的农户收入流动性较强,但总体呈向下流动趋势.2)乡村旅游能够显著促使农户收入向上流动;在边际效应上,乡村旅游促进农户收入上升1~2个阶层的作用最大;上述结论在克服样本自选择问题、替换变量衡量方式、更换计量模型等稳健性检验后依然成立.3)乡村旅游对农户收入流动性的影响存在阶段差异与群体差异.分阶段看,乡村旅游对农户收入向上流动的积极影响随时间的推移而增强,且该积极影响在2014年后更为突出.分群体看,乡村旅游对低收入农户的收入向上流动具有显著促进作用;对中等收入农户和高收入农户分别具有消极影响和积极影响,但均不显著.研究结论为乡村旅游发展情境下破解农村收入阶层固化、促进收入合理有序流动提供了决策参考,政府未来一方面应在因地制宜发展乡村旅游的基础上,延伸乡村旅游全产业链、开展职业技能培训以持续扩大乡村旅游的收入效应;另一方面,应优化投资环境、建立健全利益协调机制来兼顾乡村旅游发展的"提低扩中"效应.
Impact of Development of Rural Tourism on the Income Mobility of Farm Households:Using Empirical Data from the China Family Panel Studies
Promoting equality of opportunities and facilitating upward mobility is a necessary condition for achieving common prosperity.As a new growth point for the rural economy,the importance of rural tourism in alleviating poverty and promoting farm households'income has been widely recognized.Nevertheless,there are few studies exploring the impact of development of rural tourism on the relative status of farm household income from an income mobility perspective.Therefore,we empirically investigate whether development of rural tourism contributes positively to farm household income mobility.In particular,this research attempts to answer the following questions.1)Can development of rural tourism affect the income mobility of farm households?Is the effect positive or negative?2)Is the effect of development of rural tourism on farm households'income mobility time varying in nature?3)Does the effect of development of rural tourism on farm households'income mobility differ across income groups?To investigate these questions,we select panel data from the China Family Panel Studies(CFPS)database for the period of 2010 to 2018 as the study sample,and employ an ordered probit model as the main estimator,using ordered logit and propensity score matching methods for robustness checks.Furthermore.to test for heterogeneity,we divide the research period into four phases(2010-2012,2012-2014,2014-2016,and 2016-2018)based on the characteristics of CFPS data,and classify the study sample into low-,middle-,and high-income farm households.This research shows that:1)overall,the farm households'income mobility declines from 2010 to 2018.For the low-and high-income farm classes,income mobility tend to be solidified;farm households in the middle-income class have strong income mobility,but it generally shows a downward trend.2)Development of rural tourism has a significant positive impact on improving farm household income mobility.In terms of marginal effects,development of rural tourism has the greatest role in promoting farm households'income to rise by one or two classes.Moreover,these conclusions remain valid after the robustness tests.3)There are period differences and group differences in the impact of development of rural tourism on farm household income mobility.The positive impact of development of rural tourism on the upward income mobility of farm households'increases with time,and is more prominent after 2014.From the perspective of groups,development of rural tourism significantly contributes to the upward income mobility of low-income farm households;it has a negative but not significant effect on middle-income farm households.This research raises several questions for further research.First,owing to a lack of tourism statistics for rural areas,we use"village/house belonging to a scenic tourist area(welcoming tourists)"as the variable for development of rural tourism,which does not fully reflect the development of rural tourism.Future researchers should test the impact of rural tourism development on farm households'income mobility using higher-quality rural tourism development data.Second,there are significant differences between income groups in terms of the impact of development of rural tourism on the farm households'income mobility,and researchers should focus on the mechanism of influence causing these differences.

development of rural tourismincome mobilityincome distributionfarm households

吴志才、熊娇

展开 >

华南理工大学旅游管理系,广东广州 510006

华南理工大学数字乡村与文旅可持续发展重点实验室,广东广州 510006

华南理工大学广东旅游战略与政策研究中心,广东广州 510006

乡村旅游 收入流动性 收入分配 农户

教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目广东省哲学社会科学创新工程2022年度特别委托项目

22JHQ020GD22TWCXGC05

2024

旅游学刊
北京联合大学旅游学院

旅游学刊

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.013
ISSN:1002-5006
年,卷(期):2024.39(8)