首页|数字检察视域下虚假仲裁法律监督理论拓补与路径构造

数字检察视域下虚假仲裁法律监督理论拓补与路径构造

扫码查看
虚假仲裁因其高度隐秘性成为当前检察监督的盲区。由于仲裁"依当事人申请"的法院撤销权受限、仲裁机构内部控制动力机制不足等因素,亟需加强虚假仲裁检察监督;而当前检察机关的"间接监督"模式限缩了其对虚假仲裁的规制能力,传统法律监督方式对虚假仲裁的查处力度相对孱弱。在数字检察背景下,通过数字化法律监督方式应对虚假仲裁成为有效解决路径。同时,数字化检察监督模式亦面临新的挑战,亟需进行理论拓补与制度构建。虚假仲裁数字检察监督的权力基础源于宪法对检察机关法律监督的赋权以及仲裁的准司法性,对虚假仲裁的数字检察监督需树立积极主义法律监督观进行理念调适。应当通过协同治理下虚假仲裁信息源获取、虚假仲裁识别与查明的算法工具辅助、虚假仲裁数字检察监督的限度与规范化等,构建虚假仲裁数字检察监督实现路径。
Theoretical Expansion and Institutional Construction of Digital Legal Supervision over Fake Arbitration
Fake arbitration has surfaced as a problematic area for prosecutorial supervision due to its secrecy.The limited court revoking power and the inadequate internal control have made strengthening prosecutorial supervision of fake arbitration necessary.Nonetheless,the current"indirect supervision"model has restricted prosecutors'regulation of fake arbitration,weakening the prosecutorial investigation of the problem.One way to resolve the concern is applying digital prosecution to fake arbitration.Digital prosecution faces new challenges,such as enhancing theoretical and system construction.Prosecutors'authority to oversee fake arbitration comes from the prosecutorial supervision power prescribed in the Constitution.It is important to establish positive perceptions of prosecutorial supervision.Collaborative governance shall be launched to collect fake arbitration information,and algorithmic tools can be used to identify fake arbitration.Besides,the limitations and standardization of digital prosecutorial supervision over fake arbitration should also be clarified.

fake arbitrationdigital prosecutionlegal supervisionlimit of power

丁瑶

展开 >

山东大学法学院

虚假仲裁 数字检察 法律监督 权力限度

2024

兰州学刊
兰州市社会科学院 兰州市社会科学界联合会

兰州学刊

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.401
ISSN:1005-3492
年,卷(期):2024.(5)