《资本论》与城市空间——列斐伏尔《马克思主义思想与城市》评析
Capital and Urban Space:Research on Lefebvre's Marxist Thought and the City
张一兵1
作者信息
- 1. 南京大学;南京大学马克思主义社会理论研究中心;南京大学哲学系(江苏 南京210023)
- 折叠
摘要
列斐伏尔认为,马克思在《资本论》中对资本主义城市空间的思考,可以从剩余价值的赋型和剩余价值的实现两个视角来认识,城市既是资本主义剩余价值赋型的重要场境,也是剩余价值实现自身的必要条件.城市本身是一定历史条件下出现的特定社会产物,在对城市的观察中,必须从可感觉得到的对象性的建筑、街道的空间中发现人与人的社会关系,比如商品交易市场中发生的劳动交换关系被客观地抽象为价值关系,并且事物化颠倒为货币和资本,这样,社会关系在其中变成了可感觉的物,人们在商店中用金钱换取商品,在生产过程中遭遇劳动对象、机器和厂房,却无法知道这些物并不是它们自身,而是经济物象化结果的社会物.列斐伏尔对《资本论》的研究具有一定的启示,但其思想终归难逃人本主义窠臼.
Abstract
According to Lefebvre,Marx's thinking about capitalist urban space in Capital can be recognized from two perspectives:the empowerment of surplus value and the realization of surplus value:the city is both an important field background for the empowerment of capitalist surplus value and a necessary condition for the realization of surplus value itself.The city itself is a specific social product and life that emerges under certain historical conditions,and in the observation of the city,the social relations between people that must be discovered in the spatial syntax of perceptible object-oriented buildings and streets,such as the labor exchange relations that take place in the market for the exchange of commodities,are objectively abstracted as relations of value,and the thingification is reversed into money and capital,so that"social relations become sensible objects in them"and people exchange money for commodities in stores and encounter objects of labor,machines and plants in the process of production without being able to know that these objects are not themselves,but social objects that are the result of economic objectification.
关键词
列斐伏尔/马克思主义思想与城市/资本论/城市空间Key words
Lefebvre/Marxist Thought and the City/Capital/urban space引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据