首页|波普浪潮——20世纪60年代的波普现象及其批评

波普浪潮——20世纪60年代的波普现象及其批评

扫码查看
本文旨在回顾波普艺术的概念、现象及其批评状况.回顾劳伦斯·阿洛维的两篇评论将帮助我们重识早期波普艺术的文化人类学维度.约翰·科普兰斯以扼要清晰的论点阐明了波普艺术在何种程度上区别于抽象表现主义,因而更像是一种典型的美国艺术.反对波普的批评家认定它是一种低级的趣味,因为它们远离了绘画媒介或元语言的探索,反而拥抱起大众文化与市场逻辑.列奥·施坦伯格将波普与更为宏大的理论框架联系到一起,为波普研究的正典化提供了图像学的维度.近年来,托马斯·克洛与哈尔·福斯特的专著研究回到了阿洛维的最初定义,就波普艺术与其所处的光谱两端——流行文化与美术馆传统——的关系展开分析,这为波普艺术研究打开了全新的视野与面貌.
The Pop Wave-The Pop Phenomenon in the 1960s and Its Criticism
The purpose of this paper is to review the concept,phenomenon and critical status of Pop Art.A review of two essays by Lawrence Alloway will help us to reacquaint ourselves with the cultural anthropological dimensions of early Pop Art.In a concise and clear argument,John Coplans clarifies the extent to which Pop Art is distinct from abstract expressionism and therefore more like a quintessentially American art.Critics who opposed Pop identified it as a low form of taste because they turned away from the exploration of the pictorial medium or meta-language and instead embraced popular culture and the logic of the market.Leo Steinberg linked Pop to a more ambitious theoretical framework,providing an iconographic dimension to the canonization of Pop studies.In recent years,Thomas Crow and Hal Foster's monograph studies have returned to Alloway's original definition to develop a new analysis of Pop Art in relation to the two ends of the spectrum on which it sits:popular culture and the museum tradition,which opens up a whole new perspective and outlook on Pop Art studies.

Pop ArtLaurence Allowaythe flatbed picturefolk art

夏天

展开 >

复旦大学哲学学院艺术哲学系

波普艺术 劳伦斯·阿洛维 平台式画面 民间艺术

2024

美术观察
中国艺术研究院

美术观察

北大核心
影响因子:0.107
ISSN:1006-8899
年,卷(期):2024.(9)