论作为债权让与对抗要件的债务人承诺
On the Debtor's Commitment as a Counter Requirement of Assignment of Claims
和田胜行 1冯洁语 2王靖泽雨3
作者信息
- 1. 京都大学大学院法学研究科
- 2. 南京大学法学院;南京大学中德法学研究所
- 3. 南京大学法学院
- 折叠
摘要
2016年日本债法改正中对于是否保留债务人承诺作为债权让与对抗要件进行了讨论.争议的焦点主要在于债务人承诺是对抗要件还是权利主张要件,删除承诺是否会造成实务上的不便,删除承诺的话,债务人能否在未收到通知的情况下,向债权受让人清偿等问题上.从审议的过程来看,是否保留承诺作为对抗要件,这一问题涉及将债务人作为信息中心是否会加重债务人的负担,将债务人作为信息中心是否可行,如果债务人积极参与债权让与,是否应当让其承担一定的风险等债权让与基本理论问题.由于存在较大的争议,最终形成的改正方案对债务人承诺制度没有进行太大改动.
Abstract
In the 2016 revision of the Japanese Law of Obligations,there was a discussion on whether to retain the debtor's commitment as a counter requirement of the assignment of claims.The dispute centered on whether the debtor's commitment was a counter requirement or a requirement for a claim,whether deletion of the commitment would cause practical inconvenience,and whether the debtor could satisfy the assignee of the claim without notice if the commitment was deleted.During the deliberation process,the question of whether to retain commitment as a counter requirement involves the basic theoretical issues of the assignment of claims such as whether making the debtor a information center would increase the debtor's burden,whether it is feasible for the debtor to act as an information center,and whether the debtor should be allowed to bear certain risks if the debtor actively participates in the assignment of claims.Due to the considerable controversy,the finalized amendment proposal did not make much change to the debtor's commitment system.
关键词
债权让与/对抗要件/债务人承诺/债务人信息中心/权利主张要件Key words
Assignment of Claims/Counter Requirements/Debtor's Commitment/Debtor Information Center/Requirements for Claims引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据