摘要
我国在行政协议制度确立后,面临着行政协议赔偿法律适用混乱的问题.目前对于行政协议损失赔偿的法律适用,学界存在四种学说:分段区分适用说、类型化适用说、民事赔偿说以及国家赔偿说;司法实践存在三种立场:仅适用民事法律规范、仅适用国家赔偿规范、二者混合适用.判断适用何种法律应当考虑行政协议的性质、损失出现的阶段及损失数额.缔约阶段应当适用民事违约赔偿的法律规范;履行阶段应适用国家赔偿的法律规范并参照修正后的民事法律规范对有限赔偿范围进行扩张.程序应当适用行政赔偿诉讼程序.
Abstract
After the establishment of the administrative agreement system in our country,issues have arisen regarding the inconsistent application of laws in administrative agreement compensation.There are four theories in academia:segmented application,typified ap-plication,civil compensation,and state compensation.Judicial practice shows three positions:exclusive application of civil law norms,exclusive application of state compensation norms,and a mixed approach.In determining which law to apply,consideration should be given to the nature of the administrative agreement,the stages at which the loss occurred and the amount of the loss.Sub-stantively,the legal norms of compensation for civil breach of contract should be applied in the contracting stage.The legal norms of state compensation should be applied and the scope of limited compensation should be expanded with reference to the revised civil legal norms.Administrative compensation litigation procedures should be followed.
维普
万方数据