首页|权责主体认知偏移对农户耕地保护技术选择偏好的机制研究

权责主体认知偏移对农户耕地保护技术选择偏好的机制研究

扫码查看
基于苏皖两省农村入户调查数据,分析农地流转视角下的农户权责主体认知偏移对耕地保护技术选择偏好的影响机制.研究发现:(1)流转视角下农户对耕地保护权责"各有所表","谁种谁保护"的实用主义和"是谁的,谁保护"的物权意识并存,农户耕地保护"角色—认知—行为"的多重偏离致使其技术选择偏好于短期和浅表型技术.(2)农户耕地保护权责主体非己认知对行为发生数、中长期行为和深入改进型行为均有负向影响.(3)农户权责主体偏移显著抑制耕地保护投资,但较长的流转租期能对冲非己认知对投资及行为偏好的负向影响.据此,未来引导农户参与耕地保护,应通过"政府宣传+技术推广"体系适度纠正农户对耕地保护权责主体的认知偏移,立足产品增值与流转制度保障协同增进农户对采纳耕地保护技术的经济预期,以及推进耕地保护补贴和农村"两权"抵押贷款等政策创新.
A Study on the Mechanism of Cognitive Bias of the Responsible Subject to Farmers'Selection Preference for Cropland Protection Technology
This study employs survey data from rural households in Jiangsu and Anhui provinces to examine the mechanism underlying cognitive bias in the responsibility subjects that influence farmers'preferences for farmland protection technologies within the context of farmland transfer.The analysis reveals several key findings:Firstly,from the perspective of farmland transfer,farmers'rights and responsibilities in arable land protection are characterized by distinct temporalities,encompassing both the pragmatic approach of"whoever uses,whoever protects"and the proprietary stance of"whoever owns,whoever protects."The multifaceted deviations in farmers'role-perception-behavior regarding arable land protection result in a preference for short-term and superficial technologies.Secondly,farmers'perception of themselves as non-principal agents in arable land protection negatively impacts the frequency and duration of protective behaviors,as well as the propensity for behavior enhancement.Thirdly,the cognitive bias in farmers'rights and responsibilities significantly curtails investment in farmland protection;however,longer transfer leases can mitigate the adverse effects of farmers'non-principal responsibility perception on investment and behavioral preferences.To facilitate farmer participation in arable land protection,it is imperative to address cognitive biases through government-led public awareness and technology promotion campaigns.Additionally,leveraging the synergy between value-added agricultural products and the security of the transfer system can enhance farmers'economic expectations of adopting arable land protection technologies.Furthermore,policy innovations such as the introduction of land protection subsidies and the development of rural land mortgage initiatives for contractual and franchise rights should be pursued.

Farmland ConservationConservation Tillage TechnologyPerception of Subjects to Right and ResponsibilityChoice Preferences

王全忠、朱赛、周宏

展开 >

安庆师范大学 经济与管理学院,安庆 246133

南京农业大学 经济管理学院,南京 210095

耕地保护 保护性耕作技术 权责主体认知 选择偏好

国家社会科学基金项目安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划一般项目

23BGL264AHSKY2022D128gxyq2022031

2024

南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)
南京农业大学

南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.375
ISSN:1671-7465
年,卷(期):2024.24(4)
  • 30