首页|表观扩散系数值在预测低中危前列腺癌Gleason分级中的价值

表观扩散系数值在预测低中危前列腺癌Gleason分级中的价值

扫码查看
目的:探讨表观扩散系数(ADC)值对低中危前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断效能及其与Gleason评分(GS)之间的相关性.方法:收集2020 年1 月至2021 年12 月南京鼓楼医院前列腺受检者的临床影像数据进行回顾性分析.测量病灶的ADC值,分析ADC在低中危PCa诊断中的效能,以及ADC值与GS之间的相关性,比较平均表观扩散系数值(ADCmean)和最小表观扩散系数值(ADCmin)的诊断效能.结果:纳入 1 051 例患者,病灶总数为1 202 个,其中638 个为PCa(53.08%),564 个为良性病变(46.92%).良性病变组的ADCmin及ADCmean明显高于PCa组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01).GS4 +3 组的ADCmin及ADCmean显著低于GS3 + 4 组、GS3 +3 组和良性组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01).诊断PCa的ADCmin和ADCmean的AUC分别为0.911、0.972,诊断界值分别为0.703×10-3 mm2·s-1、0.896×10-3 mm2·s-1.ADCmin、ADCmean与GS呈负性相关(ρs =-0.764,P<0.001;ρs =-0.845,P<0.001).结论:ADC值与低中危PCa侵袭性呈负相关,对GS3 +4、GS4 +3 病灶具有较高的鉴别诊断价值,敏感度、特异度高,且ADCmean的诊断价值更高,可对PCa生物学特性进行有效的术前评估,辅助临床医师制订治疗方案,有效避免过度治疗.
The value of magnetic resonance imaging apparent diffusion coefficient values in predicting Gleason grading of low to intermediate-risk prostate cancer
Objective:To investigate the diagnostic performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)for low to intermediate-risk prostate cancer(PCa),as well as its correlation with the prognostic Gleason score(GS).Methods:The images and data from prostate examination patients at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were collected for retrospective analysis spanning January 2020 to December 2021.During this analysis,the ADC values of lesions were measured to assess the efficacy of ADC in diagnosing low to intermediate-risk PCa.Additionally,the correla-tion between ADC values and GS was investigated,and the diagnostic efficacy between mean apparent diffusion coef-ficient values(ADCmean)and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient values(ADCmin)was compared.Results:Among the 1 051 patients,there were a total of 1 202 lesions,with 638 cases identified as PCa(53.08%)and 564 cases as benign lesions(46.92%).The benign lesion group exhibited significantly higher ADCmin and ADCmean val-ues compared to the PCa group,and these differences were statistically significant(P<0.01).In terms of GS,the ADCmin and ADCmean values of the GS 4 +3 group were significantly lower than those of the GS 3 +4 group,GS 3 + 3 group,and the benign group,with all differences being statistically significant(P<0.01).The AUC values for diagnosing PCa based on ADCmin and ADCmean were 0.911 and 0.972,respectively.The corresponding diagnostic thresholds were 0.703×10-3 mm2·s-1 for ADCmin and 0.896×10-3 mm2·s-1 for ADCmean.The magnitudes of ADCmin and ADCmean values exhibited a negative correlation with GS values(ρs =-0.764,P<0.001;ρs =-0.845,P<0.001).Conclusion:ADC values demonstrate an inverse relationship with the invasiveness of low to intermediate-risk PCa.They offer notable diagnostic value,particularly in distinguishing between GS 3 +4 and GS 4 +3 lesions,exhibiting both high sensitivity and specificity.Additionally,ADCmean exhibits even greater diagnostic utility,facilitating effective preoperative assessment of PCa's biological attributes.This aids clinicians in formulating treatment strategies and mitigating the risk of excessive therapeutic interventions.

prostate cancermagnetic resonance imagingapparent diffusion coefficientGleason score

闫旭、马柯、王玉婷、潘燚琪、祝丽、马义、李丹燕、麦筱莉

展开 >

徐州医科大学鼓楼临床学院 医学影像科,江苏 南京 210008

南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院 医学影像科,江苏 南京 210008

南京医科大学鼓楼临床医学院 医学影像科,江苏 南京 210008

前列腺癌 磁共振成像 表观扩散系数 Gleason分级评分

2024

东南大学学报(医学版)
东南大学

东南大学学报(医学版)

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.374
ISSN:1671-6264
年,卷(期):2024.43(2)
  • 23