Clarification of Disputes and Collaborative Integration Between Traditional Periodization and Block Periodization
Utilizing methods such as literature review,logical analysis,and expert interviews,this study systematically examines the applicability and interrelations between Traditional Periodization and Block Periodization.The research highlights that the main controversies between these theories center on their ability to meet the demands for the coordinated development of multiple capacities,the division of training phases,and the arrangement of training loads.Traditional Periodization emphasizes the development of comprehensive abilities but falls short in addressing individual and team sports,as well as the intensity of competitions.In contrast,Block Periodization underscores targeted training but faces challenges in comprehensiveness and integration.Despite conceptual differences,there is no significant divergence in their logical essence,making their collaborative integration key to resolving disputes.In terms of ability development,drawing on the targeted principle of the segmented training model,the training content is subdivided into various sections,with a focus on specific ability training.Regarding phase division,based on the stage characteristics of classical staging theory,and according to the characteristics of athletes and the schedule arrangement,the training stages are reasonably divided.In terms of training load arrangement,flexibly adjusting and combining the training content and loads from different blocks can cultivate athletes'comprehensive and special abilities in a targeted manner to meet the demands of modern competitive sports.
competitive sportstraining loadcompetitive statesports trainingcompetitive abilitytraining plan
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
