首页|知识付费机制对用户知识贡献的影响研究——以知乎为例

知识付费机制对用户知识贡献的影响研究——以知乎为例

扫码查看
社会化问答社区是以协同生产为基础的平台,其中用户以分享为基础的知识贡献是社区运营的核心.随着用户个性化需求的增加及付费观念的养成,社会化问答社区逐渐转型为兼具免费与付费的平台.知识付费机制的引入能否及如何对用户后续的免费知识贡献行为产生影响,是一个有价值的现实课题,然而目前的研究对此讨论甚少.本文基于理性行为理论和计划行为理论,综合考虑知识的溢出效应,从个体和社区两个层面探究知识付费机制对用户(特指付费知识提供者)免费知识贡献行为的影响.具体而言,本文以知乎平台中"付费咨询"功能的推出为准自然实验,通过构造双重差分模型展开研究.结果发现,知识付费机制的推出促进了用户整体的反应和主动知识贡献,但在不同用户群体间存在着显著差异,该结论在一系列稳健性检验后仍然成立.本研究揭示了付费机制对用户免费知识贡献的作用,并为提高社区整体的提问回复率和回答质量提供了有益启示.
Research on the Impact of Knowledge Payment Mechanism on Users'Free Knowledge Contributions:Taking Zhihu as an Example
Social Q&A communities are collaborative platforms built on the basis of co-production,where user-generated knowledge contributions form the core of community operations.Community members benefit from the knowledge content constructed through"co-production".However,with the increasing demand for personalized services and the adoption of a payment mindset,social Q&A communities are gradually transitioning into platforms that offer both free and paid services.The public can leverage the platform to share their surplus cognitive resources with others and generate economic income.The introduction of a knowledge payment mech-anism raises valuable practical questions about its potential impact on subsequent free knowledge contribution from users.Although existing research extensively discusses the motivating value of knowledge payment mechanisms,its specific effects on the free knowledge contributions of knowledge providers remain unclear.We thus propose the following research questions:1)How does the introduction of a knowledge payment mechanism affect users'free knowledge contribution behaviors in the community?2)What differences exist in this impact among different user groups?Based on rational behavior theory and planned behavior theory,and considering the spillover effects of knowledge,this paper explores the impact of knowledge payment mechanisms on the free knowledge contribution behaviors of users(specifically referring to paid knowledge providers)from both individual and community perspectives.Specifically,this paper utilizes panel data from 1492 users on the Zhihu platform over two years as research samples.Taking the launch of the"paid consultation"feature as a quasi-natural experiment,a difference-in-differences model is constructed to examine the impact of knowledge payment mechanisms on the free knowledge contribution of paid knowledge providers.Additionally,group regression is conducted based on whether paid knowledge providers are social media influencers,to explore the differences in the above impacts among different user groups.The results show that the introduction of knowledge payment mechanisms promotes two types of free knowledge contributions by users(paid knowledge providers),namely reactive knowledge contributions and proactive knowledge contributions,by affecting individual knowledge contribution intentions and the community's overall knowledge contribution capacity.Coefficient difference tests indicate that this impact varies significantly among different user groups,indicating that whether or not a user is a social media influencer moderates the impact of knowledge payment mechanisms on users'free knowledge contributions.Furthermore,based on Zhihu's classification of knowledge fields,this paper conducts further analysis using sub-sample regressions,which demonstrate that knowledge payment mechanisms have significantly promoted the overall free knowledge contributions of users in various segmented fields of knowledge.The research conclusions of this paper hold true even after a series of robustness tests.The research contributions of this paper are primarily as follows:Firstly,from the perspective of rational actors among knowledge providers,this paper explores the causal relationship between user behaviors in the paid and free sections of social Q&A commu-nities for the first time,establishing a connection between the two.Secondly,theoretical analysis of knowledge spillovers in social Q&A communities and their relationship with knowledge payment deepens the understanding and research of virtual community knowledge spillovers.Thirdly,by fully considering the influence of user heterogeneity,this paper provides an opportunity to explain the divergent findings in previous research on knowledge payment.Lastly,this study offers theoretical guidance on how to correctly understand and utilize knowledge payment to improve the overall question-response rate and answer quality of the community,con-tributing to rational thinking and exploration of the continuous development of the community and the boom in the sharing economy.

Social Q&A CommunityKnowledge Payment MechanismKnowledge ContributionDifference-in-differences Model

张家铖、戚桂杰、张磊

展开 >

山东大学管理学院

社会化问答社区 知识付费机制 知识贡献 双重差分

国家自然科学基金

72072103

2024

南开管理评论
南开大学国际商学院

南开管理评论

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.438
ISSN:1008-3448
年,卷(期):2024.27(2)
  • 15