环境与发展2024,Vol.36Issue(3) :58-62.DOI:10.16647/j.cnki.cn15-1369/X.2024.03.011

火焰原子吸收光谱法、石墨炉原子吸收光谱法和电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定地表水样中铜的研究方法对比

Comparative study between flame atomic absorption spectrometry and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrom-etry for the determination of copper in surface water

王敏 侯贤贵 吴晓辉 范哲铭
环境与发展2024,Vol.36Issue(3) :58-62.DOI:10.16647/j.cnki.cn15-1369/X.2024.03.011

火焰原子吸收光谱法、石墨炉原子吸收光谱法和电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定地表水样中铜的研究方法对比

Comparative study between flame atomic absorption spectrometry and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrom-etry for the determination of copper in surface water

王敏 1侯贤贵 1吴晓辉 1范哲铭1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 成都市污染源监测中心青白江监测站,四川成都 610300
  • 折叠

摘要

采用火焰原子吸收光谱法(FAAS)、石墨炉原子吸收光谱法(GF-AAS)和电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP-OES)分别测定地表水中的铜,对检出限、精密度、正确度、低浓度环境样品测试等指标进行对比.实验结果表明,三种方法对于测定地表水中铜,测试结果无显著差异;与FAAS和ICP-OES法相比,GF-AAS法具有较低的检出限、较高灵敏度,对于测定低浓度环境样品具有较高的准确性.

Abstract

The copper in surface water was measured by flame atomic absorption spectrometry(FAAS)and graph-ite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry(GF-AAS)and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry(ICP-OES),and the detection limit,precision,accuracy and low concentration environmental samples were compared.The experimental results showed the three methods had no obvious difference between measurement results;com-pared with FAAS and ICP-OES method,GF-AAS method had the advantages of lower detection limit,higher sensitiv-ity and accuracy for the determination of low concentration environmental samples.

关键词

火焰原子吸收光谱法/石墨炉原子吸收光谱法/电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法/地表水/

Key words

Flame atomic absorption spectrometry/Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry/Inductive-ly coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry/Surface water/Copper

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
环境与发展
内蒙古自治区环境科学研究院,内蒙古环境检测中心站

环境与发展

影响因子:0.326
ISSN:1007-0370
段落导航相关论文