首页|宁夏吴忠地区胃癌机会性筛查中两种风险评分系统的效果分析

宁夏吴忠地区胃癌机会性筛查中两种风险评分系统的效果分析

扫码查看
目的 比较两种胃癌风险评分系统在宁夏吴忠地区的胃癌早期筛查效果,探讨更适用于本地区胃癌早期筛查的评分系统.方法 纳入2022年5月至2023年5月在吴忠市人民医院和盐池县人民医院行胃癌机会性筛查的40~69岁患者共1 085例.分别按照北京大学肿瘤研究中心研发的上消化道恶性肿瘤风险评分系统和新胃癌筛查评分系统同时进行胃癌风险评估,比较不同评分系统对早期胃癌的筛查效果.结果 共纳入符合条件的受试对象1 085人,其中男性539人(49.68%),女性546人(50.32%),平均年龄(54.7±7.8)岁.上消化道恶性肿瘤风险评分系统高风险率(159/1 085,14.65%)低于新胃癌筛查评分系统(353/1 085,32.53%)(x2=73.51,P<0.001).两者的筛查阳性预测值分别为4.40%和4.25%,总体一致率为74.93%(Kappa值=0.334,P<0.001).两种胃癌风险评分系统筛查阳性者的胃镜检查结果在胃癌的分布上差异无统计学意义(x2=3.00,P=0.083).上消化道恶性肿瘤风险评分系统的灵敏度(38.89%)、阴性预测值(98.81%)、诊断比值比(3.83)及ROC 曲线下面积[0.623(95%CI:0.478~0.768)]均低于新胃癌筛查评分系统[83.33%、99.59%、10.78、0.758(95%CI:0.656~0.861)];而在特异度(85.75%)、阳性预测值(4.40%)上均高于新胃癌筛查评分系统(68.32%、4.25%);两种风险评估模型的Kappa值均为0.05.结论 在宁夏吴忠地区胃癌机会性筛查准确度方面,新胃癌筛查评分系统优于上消化道恶性肿瘤风险评分系统;但在筛查效益方面,上消化道恶性肿瘤风险评分系统优于新胃癌筛查评分系统.
Analysis of the Effectiveness of Two Risk Scoring Systems in Gastric Cancer Opportunistic Screening in Wuzhong Area of Ningxia
Objective To compare the efficacy of two risk assessment models in the early screening of gastric cancer in Wuzhong of Ningxia,and to explore an evaluation system that was more suitable for early screening of gastric cancer in this area.Methods A total of 1 085 patients aged 40~69 years who underwent opportunistic screening for gastric cancer in Wuzhong People's Hospital and Yanchi County People's Hospital from May 2022 to May 2023 were included.The risk of gastric cancer was assessed simultaneously according to the"Up-per gastrointestinal cancer risk scoring system"and the"New gastric cancer screening scoring system"devel-oped by Peking University Cancer Research Center,and the screening effects of different scoring systems on early gastric cancer were compared.Results A total of 1 085 eligible subjects were included,including 539 males(49.68%),546 females(50.32%)with an average age of(54.7±7.8)years.The high-risk rate of the Upper gastrointestinal cancer risk scoring system was 14.65%(159/1 085),which was lower than that of the New gastric cancer screening scoring system 32.53%(353/1 085)(x2=73.51,P<0.001).The positive rates of the Upper gastrointestinal cancer risk scoring system and the New gastric cancer screening scoring system were 4.40%and 4.25%,respectively,and the overall consistency rate was 74.93%(Kappa value=0.334,P<0.001).There was no significant difference in the distribution of gastric cancer(x2=3.00,P=0.083).The sensitivity(38.89%),negative predictive value(98.81%)and diagnostic odds ratio(3.83)and score under the ROC curve(0.623,95%CI:0.478-0.768)of the Upper gastrointestinal cancer risk scoring system were all lower than those of the New gastric cancer screening scoring system[83.33%,99.59%,10.78 and 0.758(95%CI:0.656-0.861)].The specificity(85.75%)and positive predictive value(4.40%)were higher than those of the New gastric cancer screening scoring system(68.32%,4.25%).The Kappa value of the two risk assessment models was equal to 0.05.Conclusion The two risk scoring systems had certain predictive ability and advantages for the early di-agnosis of gastric cancer in the opportunistic screening of gastric cancer in the population of Wuzhong,Ningxia.In terms of screening accuracy,the New gastric cancer screening scoring system was superior to the Upper gas-trointestinal cancer risk scoring system,but in terms of screening benefits,the upper gastrointestinal cancer risk scoring system was superior to the New gastric cancer screening scoring system.

gastric cancerscoring systemscreeningeffect evaluation

马誉珊、游颜杰、陈仙梅、石瑞春、侯占彬、吴昱婷、呼圣娟

展开 >

宁夏医科大学第三临床医学院,银川 750002

宁夏回族自治区人民医院消化内科,宁夏医科大学第三临床医学院,银川 750002

吴忠市人民医院消化内科,吴忠 751199

盐池县人民医院消化内科,吴忠 751500

展开 >

胃癌 评分系统 筛查 效果评价

宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划

2021BEG02025

2024

宁夏医科大学学报
宁夏医科大学

宁夏医科大学学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.84
ISSN:1674-6309
年,卷(期):2024.46(4)
  • 16