首页|不同吸水暗管布设对南疆"春灌-秋灌"土壤水盐变化及排水排盐效果的影响

不同吸水暗管布设对南疆"春灌-秋灌"土壤水盐变化及排水排盐效果的影响

扫码查看
为探讨南疆不同吸水暗管布设对"春灌-秋灌"期间土壤水盐变化及暗管排水排盐的影响规律,明晰当地盐碱地治理的暗管布设适宜参数,本研究于2023年5月和9月分别进行不同暗管布设参数下的排盐淋洗试验,设置无暗管(CK),间距20 m、埋深1。0 m(A1),间距20 m、埋深1。2 m(A2),间距30 m、埋深1。2 m(A3),间距40 m、埋深1。2 m(A4),间距20 m、埋深1。5 m(A5),共六个处理,分别测定淋洗前后土壤水盐及暗管排水流量和电导率,分析土壤水盐的动态变化以及暗管系统的排水排盐效果。结果表明:土壤剖面含水量、含盐量分别呈现上低下高、上高下低的分布规律。两次淋洗后,土壤含盐量表聚现象明显减弱,各处理0~20 cm土壤平均含盐量降低44。83%。排水流量呈现先快速增大到峰值后逐渐下降的趋势,排水电导率在出流过程中相对平稳。与CK相比,A5处理两次淋洗0~60 cm土壤脱盐率分别显著提高436。88%、404。27%。通过TOPSIS综合评价法对A1~A5处理进行排盐效果评价,两次评价结果均为A5处理最优。研究表明,本试验条件下采用暗管间距20 m、埋深1。5 m的布设参数可有效提高暗管排水效率,促进土壤脱盐,可以在南疆粉壤土地区推广应用。
The impact of different configurations of subsurface drainage pipes on soil water and salt dynamics and the efficacy of salt leaching through drainage during the spring-to-autumn irrigation season in southern Xinjiang
To explore the impact patterns of different subsurface drainage pipe layouts in southern Xinjiang on soil water and salt changes during the"spring irrigation-autumn irrigation"period,and to clarify the appropriate subsurface drainage pipe layout parameters for saline-alkali land management in the local area,this study conducted saline leaching experiments under different subsurface pipe arrangement parameters in May and September 2023.Six treatments were set up,including no subsurface pipes(CK),a spacing of 20 m with a burial depth of 1.0 m(A1),a spacing of 20 m with a burial depth of 1.2 m(A2),a spacing of 30 m with a burial depth of 1.2 m(A3),a spacing of 40 m with a burial depth of 1.2 m(A4),and a spacing of 20 m with a burial depth of 1.5 m(A5).The soil water and salt content,as well as the subsurface pipe drainage flow and electrical conductivity,were measured before and after the leaching.The study analyzed the dynamics of soil water and salt,along with the efficacy of drainage and salt removal within the subsurface drainage system.The results are as follows:the distribution pattern in the soil profile shows water content decreasing from the top to the bottom,while salt content exhibits the opposite trend.Following two leaching events,the phenomenon of soil salt content aggregation was markedly diminished,resulting in a 44.83%reduction in the average salt content of the 0-20 cm soil layer across all treatments.The drainage flow rate rapidly increases to a peak value and then gradually decreases.The discharge conductivity is relatively stable during the discharge process.Compared with the control(CK),the desalination rates in the 0-60 cm soil layer for treatment A5 showed significant increases of 436.88%and 404.27%after two leachings,respectively.The salt removal effect of A1-A5 treatment was evaluated by TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation method,and A5 treatment was the best in both evaluations.Under the conditions of this experiment,the subsurface pipe spacing of 20 meters and a burial depth of 1.5 meters can effectively improve the efficiency of subsurface drainage and promote soil desalination.This method can be widely promoted and used in the loess-like loam region of southern Xinjiang.

subsurface drainage for saline removalsoil water and salt dynamicsdesalination ratedrainage and saline removal per unit areaspring irrigationautumn irrigation

郭涵、马英杰、王广宁、马亮

展开 >

新疆农业大学水利与土木工程学院,乌鲁木齐 830052

新疆水利工程安全与水灾害防治重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830052

暗管排盐 土壤水盐变化 脱盐率 单位面积排水排盐量 春灌 秋灌

2024

农业资源与环境学报
农业部环境保护科研监测所,中国农业生态环境保护协会

农业资源与环境学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.059
ISSN:2095-6819
年,卷(期):2024.41(6)