皮革制作与环保科技2024,Vol.5Issue(1) :126-128.DOI:10.20025/j.cnki.CN10-1679.2024-01-43

环境空气中非甲烷总烃气相色谱法的两种不确定度评估方法比较

Comparison of Two Uncertainty Evaluation Methods of Non-methane Total Hydrocarbons in Ambient Air by Gas Chromatography

黄尽磊
皮革制作与环保科技2024,Vol.5Issue(1) :126-128.DOI:10.20025/j.cnki.CN10-1679.2024-01-43

环境空气中非甲烷总烃气相色谱法的两种不确定度评估方法比较

Comparison of Two Uncertainty Evaluation Methods of Non-methane Total Hydrocarbons in Ambient Air by Gas Chromatography

黄尽磊1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 上海思禾环境技术有限公司,上海 200000
  • 折叠

摘要

本文运用Top-down两种不确定度评估法,即控制图法和线性拟合法对环境空气中非甲烷总烃气相色谱中的甲烷不确定度进行了评估.结果表明,控制图法的不确定度结果为:(3.05±0.19)(k=2)mg/m3;使用线性拟合法结果在0.86~8.57(mg/m3)范围内,不确定度为0.15,(k=2)mg/m3.评估结果无显著差异.两种方法是基于实验室日常积累的质控数据,对环境实验室的日常分析进行质量控制,其操作性更强,适用范围更广.

Abstract

Using Top-down two uncertainty evaluation methods,the control chart method and the linear fitting method,to evaluate the uncertainty of methane in the non-methane total hydrocarbons in the ambient air by gas chromatography.The results shows that the uncertainty result of the control chart method is:(3.05±0.19)(k=2)mg/m3,the result of using the linear fitting method is in the range of 0.86~8.57(mg/m3),the uncertainty is 0.15,(k=2)mg/m3.There are no obvious differences between the two methods via the result.These two methods are based on the quality control data accumulated daily in the laboratory,daily analysis quality control of environmental laboratories,its operability is stronger,wider scope of application.

关键词

控制图法/线性拟合法/不确定度/甲烷

Key words

control chart method/the linear fitting method/uncertainty/methane

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
皮革制作与环保科技

皮革制作与环保科技

ISSN:
参考文献量2
段落导航相关论文