首页|环境空气中非甲烷总烃气相色谱法的两种不确定度评估方法比较

环境空气中非甲烷总烃气相色谱法的两种不确定度评估方法比较

扫码查看
本文运用Top-down两种不确定度评估法,即控制图法和线性拟合法对环境空气中非甲烷总烃气相色谱中的甲烷不确定度进行了评估.结果表明,控制图法的不确定度结果为:(3.05±0.19)(k=2)mg/m3;使用线性拟合法结果在0.86~8.57(mg/m3)范围内,不确定度为0.15,(k=2)mg/m3.评估结果无显著差异.两种方法是基于实验室日常积累的质控数据,对环境实验室的日常分析进行质量控制,其操作性更强,适用范围更广.
Comparison of Two Uncertainty Evaluation Methods of Non-methane Total Hydrocarbons in Ambient Air by Gas Chromatography
Using Top-down two uncertainty evaluation methods,the control chart method and the linear fitting method,to evaluate the uncertainty of methane in the non-methane total hydrocarbons in the ambient air by gas chromatography.The results shows that the uncertainty result of the control chart method is:(3.05±0.19)(k=2)mg/m3,the result of using the linear fitting method is in the range of 0.86~8.57(mg/m3),the uncertainty is 0.15,(k=2)mg/m3.There are no obvious differences between the two methods via the result.These two methods are based on the quality control data accumulated daily in the laboratory,daily analysis quality control of environmental laboratories,its operability is stronger,wider scope of application.

control chart methodthe linear fitting methoduncertaintymethane

黄尽磊

展开 >

上海思禾环境技术有限公司,上海 200000

控制图法 线性拟合法 不确定度 甲烷

2024

皮革制作与环保科技

皮革制作与环保科技

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.5(1)
  • 2