萍乡学院学报2024,Vol.41Issue(5) :52-55.

论商标恶意诉讼反赔中的惩罚性赔偿

Punitive Damages in Trademark Malicious Litigation Counterclaims

谢熙坤
萍乡学院学报2024,Vol.41Issue(5) :52-55.

论商标恶意诉讼反赔中的惩罚性赔偿

Punitive Damages in Trademark Malicious Litigation Counterclaims

谢熙坤1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,湖北武汉 430073
  • 折叠

摘要

商标恶意诉讼具有形式合法的外在表现和权利滥用的内在属性,对私权利和公共利益产生双重损害.在商标恶意诉讼反赔制度中引入惩罚性赔偿规则,既可鼓励被诉人积极维权,也可惩戒和威慑恶意诉讼行为人.在反赔制度中施行惩罚性赔偿,应当首先赋予被诉人以商标恶意诉讼抗辩权和反赔请求权的权利基础,再将其适用限于商标恶意诉讼情节严重的场景,最后,惩罚性赔偿金额应以补偿性赔偿为基数,惩罚倍数须符合"罚过相当"的原则.

Abstract

Trademark malicious litigation has the external manifestation of formal legality and the internal attribute of abuse of rights,which causes double damage to private rights and public interests.The introduction of punitive damages in the counterclaim system of trademark malicious litigation can not only encourage the alleged infringer to actively defend his rights,but also punish and deter the trademark malicious litigant.The implementation of punitive damages in the counterclaim system should be based on giving the alleged infringer the right to defend against malicious trademark litigation and the right to request for counterclaim,and in the case of serious malicious trademark litigation,the amount of punitive damages should be based on compensatory damages,and the multiplier of the punishment should be in line with the principle of"punishment commensurate with the fault".

关键词

商标恶意诉讼/反赔制度/权利滥用/惩罚性赔偿

Key words

trademark malicious litigation/counterclaim system/abuse of rights/punitive damages

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
萍乡学院学报
萍乡高等专科学校

萍乡学院学报

影响因子:0.275
ISSN:2095-9249
段落导航相关论文