美国跨境数据流动国际倡议与国内政策的差异及其成因
An Analysis on Differences Between the U.S.Transborder Data Flows International Initiative and Domestic Policies and Its Causes
华佳凡1
作者信息
- 1. 清华大学国际关系学系 北京 100084
- 折叠
摘要
[研究目的]美国跨境数据流动领域的国际倡议与国内政策在部分事项上存在差异,呈现一定的双重标准.既有研究往往忽略这一差异,可能导致理解美国行为动机出现偏差,因此有必要细化研究.[研究方法]通过既有文献,阐明数据本地化功能,在此基础上以解释学方法来确定美国在跨境数据流动领域的关注点与核心诉求,并以各国条约文件、正式声明、官员言论等补充证据链条.[研究结论]分析发现,美国双重标准的成因在于希望维持领域内优势地位.通过要求它国接受数据自由流动来确保自身网络进攻优势与数字企业优势地位,同时在国内实行一定的本地化措施以应对该领域内来自中国的挑战.
Abstract
[Research purpose]There are some differences between the international initiatives and domestic policies of the United States in the field of transborder data flow,exhibiting a certain double standard.Existing researches often ignore this difference,which may lead to bias in understanding U.S.motives.Therefore,it is necessary to refine the research of this issue.[Research method]Based on exist-ing literature,this article clarifies the functions of data localization.On this basis,using the interpretivist approach,this article determines the concerns and core appeals of the U.S.in the field of transborder data flow.And the evidence chain of this article is supplied with vari-ous countries'treaty documents,official statements,officials'remarks and so on.[Research conclusion]The reason for the U.S.double standard lies in the desire to maintain its dominant position in the field of transborder data flow.The U.S.requires other countries to ac-cept free data flow to ensure its own cyber offensive advantages and the dominant position of its digital enterprises.Meanwhile,it imple-ments certain localization measures domestically to deal with the challenge from China in the field of transborder data flow.
关键词
美国/跨境数据流动/数据本地化/网络防御/数字产业/国际倡议Key words
U.S./transborder data flow/data localization/cyber defense/digital industry/international initiatives引用本文复制引用
基金项目
清华大学自主科研计划(2021THZWJC36)
出版年
2024
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
维普
万方数据