青少年犯罪问题2024,Issue(2) :61-70.

司法鉴定证据审查的类型化研究

Typological Research on Examination of Judicial Identification Evidence

李双双 杜志淳
青少年犯罪问题2024,Issue(2) :61-70.

司法鉴定证据审查的类型化研究

Typological Research on Examination of Judicial Identification Evidence

李双双 1杜志淳2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 华东政法大学;南京警察学院
  • 2. 华东政法大学
  • 折叠

摘要

司法鉴定证据作为法律与科技融合的产物,具有法律性与科学性双重特点,是认定案件法律事实的重要依据.司法鉴定过程与鉴定人所采用的科学手段、具备的专业知识高度相关,加强对司法鉴定证据的审查具有客观和现实必要.各类案件涉及的司法鉴定证据类别多样、专业背景复杂,审查不同类别的司法鉴定证据时,其内容与方式存在区别,从法律性与科学性两方面重点分析三类司法鉴定证据的审查要点,能够帮助参与司法活动的人员快速理解鉴定意见的争议易发点,形成自己的判断.为提升司法鉴定证据审查工作的质量,可以建立不同类型的司法鉴定证据审查框架、促进法律人员技术化与技术人员法律化,确保司法鉴定证据的司法效力与高效运用.

Abstract

As a product of the integration of law and science and technology,forensic evidence has the dual characteristics of legal and scientific nature,and is an important basis for determining the legal facts of the case.The process of judicial identification is highly related to the scientific means and expertise of the apprais-er.It is objective and realistic to strengthen the examination of the evidence of judicial identification.The types of forensic evidence involved in various cases are diverse and the professional background is complex.When re-viewing different types of forensic evidence,there are differences in content and methods.The analysis of the three types of forensic evidence from the aspects of legal and scientific aspects can help the personnel involved in judicial activities quickly understand the controversial points of expert opinions and form their own judg-ments.In order to improve the quality of the review of forensic evidence,we can establish a review framework for different types of forensic evidence,promote the technicalization of legal personnel and the legalization of technical personnel,and ensure the judicial effectiveness and efficient use of forensic evidence.

关键词

司法鉴定证据/法律性/科学性/审查要点

Key words

judicial identification evidence/legality/scientificalness/key points of examination

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
青少年犯罪问题
华东政法大学

青少年犯罪问题

CSTPCDCHSSCD
影响因子:0.743
ISSN:1006-1509
参考文献量25
段落导航相关论文