首页|三种甲型流感病毒抗原POCT的应用比较

三种甲型流感病毒抗原POCT的应用比较

扫码查看
目的 比较甲型流感病毒抗原即时检验(POCT)免疫荧光法、乳胶免疫层析法和免疫胶体金法的临床诊断效能.方法 以qRT-PCR为诊断标准,比较3种甲型流感病毒抗原POCT对甲型流感病毒的检出限、分析特异性和在临床样本检测中的诊断灵敏度和诊断特异性.结果 免疫荧光法、乳胶免疫层析法和免疫胶体金法对H1N1pdm09 的检出限分别为 1∶10000、1∶1 000 和 1∶100,对季节性流感 H1N1、H1N1(PR8 株)、H3N2(Aichi 株)、禽流感病毒H6N2和H7N3的检出限分别为1∶100 000、1∶10 000和1∶1 000.检出限从低到高依次为免疫荧光法、乳胶免疫层析法和免疫胶体金法.3种甲型流感病毒抗原POCT对除甲流外的25种临床呼吸道感染常见病原体均无交叉反应.与qRT-PCR相比,免疫荧光法、乳胶免疫层析法、免疫胶体金法的诊断灵敏度分别为74.63%、56.72%和40.30%,免疫荧光法的诊断灵敏度高于乳胶免疫层析法,差异有统计学意义(x2=46.13,P<0.05),免疫荧光法的诊断灵敏度高于免疫胶体金法,差异有统计学意义(x2=71.94,P<0.05),乳胶免疫层析法的诊断灵敏度高于免疫胶体金法,差异有统计学意义(x2=103.54,P<0.05).免疫荧光法、乳胶免疫层析法、免疫胶体金法的诊断特异性分别为96.41%、100.00%、100.00%,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.86、0.78和0.70.结论 免疫荧光法在3种甲型流感病毒抗原POCT中表现最佳,具有最低的检出限、最高的诊断灵敏度和AUC,以及较好的分析特异性和诊断特异性,可满足临床对甲型流感病毒抗原的快速检测需求.
Comparison of three assays for point-of-care testing of influenza A virus antigen
Objective To compare the clinical diagnostic performance of influenza A virus antigen point-of-care testing(POCT)by immunofluorescence assay,latex immunochromatographic assay,and immunochromatographic colloidal gold assay.Methods qRT-PCR was used as the diagnostic standard;the detection limit,analytical specificity,and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of three influenza A virus antigen POCT methods were compared in clinical samples.Results The detection limits of immunofluorescence assay,latex immunochromatographic assay,and immunochromatographic colloidal gold assay for H1N1pdm09 were 1∶10 000,1∶1 000,and 1:100,respectively,and for seasonal influenza H1N1,H1N1(PR8 strain),H3N2(Aichi strain),avian influenza virus H6N2,and H7N3 were 1∶100 000,1∶10 000,and 1∶1 000,respectively.The detection limits were in the order of immunofluorescence assay,latex immunochromatographic assay,and immunochromatographic colloidal gold assay from low to high.None of the three influenza A virus antigen POCT methods showed cross-reaction with 25 common pathogens of clinical respiratory infections other than influenza.Compared with qRT-PCR,the diagnostic sensitivity of immunofluorescence assay,latex immunochromatographic assay,and immunochromatographic colloidal gold assay were 74.63%,56.72%,and 40.30%,respectively.The diagnostic sensitivity of immunofluorescence assay was significantly higher than that of latex immunochromatographic assay and immunochromatographic colloidal gold assay(x2=46.13,71.94;all P<0.05),and the diagnostic sensitivity of latex immunochromatographic assay was significantly higher than that of immunochromatographic colloidal gold assay(x2=103.54,P<0.05).The diagnostic specificity of immunofluorescence assay,latex immunochromatographic assay,and immunochromatographic colloidal gold assay were 96.41%,100.00%,and 100.00%,respectively.The area under the curve(AUC)of receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)of immunofluorescence assay,latex immunochromatographic assay,and immunochromatographic colloidal gold assay were 0.86,0.78 and 0.70,respectively.Conclusions Immunofluorescence assay showed the best performance among the three influenza A virus antigen POCT methods,with the lowest detection limit,the highest diagnostic sensitivity and AUC,and good analytical specificity and diagnostic specificity.It can meet the clinical demand for rapid detection of influenza A virus antigen.

Influenza A virusPoint-of-care testingImmunofluorescence assayLatex immunochromatographic assay

丁信、刘勇、黄文靖、吴秋保、伍时冠、潘思华、陈立、杨子峰、邓小燕、关文达

展开 >

广州市传染性疾病临床快速诊断与预警重点实验室,广东广州 510180

广州医科大学金域检验学院,广东广州 510180

广州金域医学检验中心有限公司,广东广州 510005

广州医科大学附属第一医院,广州呼吸健康研究院,呼吸疾病国家重点实验室,国家呼吸系统疾病临床医学研究中心,广东广州 510120

深圳市易瑞生物技术股份有限公司,广东深圳 518101

展开 >

甲型流感病毒 即时检验 免疫荧光法 乳胶免疫层析法

广州市科技局基础研究计划广东省本科高等学校教学质量与教学改革工程建设医学检验创新联合实验室项目

202102100003粤教高函[2021]29号

2024

热带医学杂志
广东省寄生虫学会 中华预防医学会

热带医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.643
ISSN:1672-3619
年,卷(期):2024.24(2)
  • 19