首页|中国南方地区EBV高危亚型与鼻咽癌之间的关系

中国南方地区EBV高危亚型与鼻咽癌之间的关系

扫码查看
目的 基于在中国南方开展的一项病例对照研究,分析不同样本来源的Epstein-Barr病毒(EBV)高危亚型与鼻咽癌发生风险的关系,并评估其在鼻咽癌诊断中的价值.方法 于2020-2021年在广东省招募150例新诊断鼻咽癌患者(鼻咽癌组)和150名非鼻咽癌健康人群(对照组),病例分别来自中山大学肿瘤防治中心鼻咽科及广东省四会癌症中心鼻咽癌高发区筛查队列.采用酶联免疫吸附试验检测EBV衣壳抗原IgA抗体(VCA-IgA)和EBV潜伏感染时表达的核抗原1 IgA抗体(EBNA1-IgA),并计算EBV抗体评分.同时采用多重PCR法,对鼻咽刷子和唾液中 EBV 高危亚型(BALF2_162476T>C、BALF2_163364C>T、BALF2_162215C>A、RPMS1_155391G>A、LMP1_WT>del)检测,分析其与鼻咽癌发生风险的关系,比较EBV抗体评分及不同标本来源BALF2对鼻咽癌的诊断效果,进一步将二者联合并评估其对鼻咽癌鉴别诊断的效能.结果 鼻咽癌组晚期(Ⅲ、Ⅳ期)占90.67%(136/150),早期(Ⅰ、Ⅱ期)占9.33%(14/150).鼻咽癌组中EBV抗体评分为高危占80%,高于对照组的2%,差异有统计学意义(x2=227.024,P<0.001).鼻咽癌组鼻咽刷子中 5 种高危亚型(BALF2_162476T>C、BALF2_163364C>T、BALF2_162215C>A、RPMS1_155391G>A、LMP1_WT>del)阳性率均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(x2=18.766、21.054、59.883、26.124、20.402,P均<0.001);其中鼻咽癌组、对照组中LMP1_WT>del阳性率最高分别为93.84%、71.08%;所有亚型检出率在早晚期患者之间差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05).鼻咽癌组唾液来源BALF2_162476T>C、BALF2_163364C>T、BALF2_162215C>A、RPMS1_155391G>A 阳性率均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(x2=8.063、8.633、8.033、14.909,P均<0.05);其中晚期患者 BALF2_162215C>A检出率高于早期(85.59%vs.55.56%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.041);其余高危亚型检出率在早晚期患者之间差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05).鼻咽刷子来源BALF2_162215C>A 与鼻咽癌风险关系最强(OR=13.36,95%CI:6.70~28.27,P<0.001).将 BALF2(162215-162476-163364)单倍体的变异进行组合,以3个低风险变异BALF2(A-T-C)作为参考时发现,鼻咽癌组鼻咽刷子样本来源中携带3个高危亚型的EBV变异检出率较高(76.71%),且与鼻咽癌的风险显著相关(C-C-T:OR=17.23,95%CI:8.33~37.94,P<0.001);单倍型 BALF2(C-C-C)和 BALF2(C-T-C)与鼻咽癌风险的OR逐渐递减(C-C-C:OR=10.34,95%CI:3.32~37.18,P<0.001;C-T-C:OR=4.31,95%CI:1.23~15.65,P=0.022);唾液样本来源中仅有 BALF2(C-C-T)与鼻咽癌的风险显著相关(OR=2.93,95%CI:1.57~5.58,P=0.001).鼻咽刷子来源EBV BALF2单倍体对鼻咽癌诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为88.67%和76.67%,将其与EBV抗体评分联合可将标志物的特异性提升至95.33%,同时保持敏感性85.33%.结论 不同标本来源的EBV高危亚型与鼻咽癌发生关系密切,结合EBV抗体评分和鼻咽刷子中的BALF2单倍体对鼻咽癌筛查有潜在价值.
Association between EBV-related high-risk subtypes and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in southern China
Objective Based on a case-control study conducted in southern China,this study analyzed the association between Epstein-Barr virus(EBV)-related high-risk subtypes from different resources and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and then evaluated their value in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods A total of 150 newly diagnosed patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma(nasopharyngeal cancer group)and 150 healthy people without nasopharyngeal carcinoma(control group)in Guangdong province were recruited for the study;nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases were recruited from Sun Yat-sen Cancer Center and Sihui Cancer Center,in 2020-2021.Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)was used to detect viral capsule antigen IgA antibodies(VCA-IgA)and EBV nuclear antigen 1 IgA antibodies(EBNA1-IgA),and the EBV antibody score was calculated.At the same time,a multiplex PCR system was developed to detect EBV high-risk subtypes(BALF2_162476T>C,BALF2_163364C>T,BALF2_162215C>A,RPMS1_155391G>A and LMP1_WT>del)in nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva,and to analyze the relationship between subtypes and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.The diagnostic efficacy of EBV antibody score and EBV BALF2 in different samples were compared,and were comprehensively evaluated their efficacy in the differential diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Results In the nasopharyngeal cancer group,late stage(stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ)accounted for 90.67%(136/150),and early stage(stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ)accounted for 9.33%(14/150).In the nasopharyngeal cancer group,80%had high-risk EBV antibody scores,which was higher than 2%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(x2=227.024,P<0.001).The positive rates of five high-risk subtypes(BALF2_162476T>C,BALF2_163364C>T,BALF2_162215C>A,RPMS1_155391G>A,LMP1_WT>del)in nasopharyngeal swabs in the nasopharyngeal cancer group were all higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(x2=18.766,21.054,59.883,26.124,20.402;all P<0.001);among them,the positive rate of LMP1_WT>del was the highest in the nasopharyngeal cancer group(93.84%)and control group(71.08%);there was no statistically significant difference in the detection rates of all subtypes between early and late patients(all P>0.05).The positive rates of BALF2_162476T>C,BALF2_163364C>T,BALF2_162215C>A and RPMS1_155391G>A from saliva in the nasopharyngeal cancer group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(x2=8.063,8.633,8.033,14.909;all P<0.05);among them,BALF2_162215C>A detection rate in late-stage patients was higher than that in the early stage(85.59%vs.55.56%),and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.041);there was no statistically significant difference in the detection rates of other high-risk subtypes between early and late patients(all P>0.05).BALF2_162215C>A detected from nasopharyngeal swabs had the strongest relationship with the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma(OR=13.36,95%CI:6.70~28.27,P<0.001).Combining the BALF2(162215-162476-163364)haplotype variants,and using the three low-risk variants BALF2(A-T-C)as a reference,it was found that the detection rate of EBV variants carrying three high-risk subtypes in the nasopharyngeal cancer group was high(76.71%),and significantly related to the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma(C-C-T:OR=17.23,95%CI:8.33-37.94,P<0.001).The haplotypes BALF2(C-C-C)and BALF2(C-T-C)were associated with a decreased OR of nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk(C-C-C:OR=10.34,95%CI:3.32-37.18,P<0.001;C-T-C:OR=4.31,95%CI:1.23-15.65,P=0.022).Among BALF2 detected in saliva samples,only BALF2(C-C-T)was significantly associated with the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma(OR=2.93,95%CI:1.57-5.58,P=0.001).The sensitivity and specificity of EBV BALF2 haplotype from nasopharyngeal swabs for diagnosing nasopharyngeal carcinoma were 88.67%and 76.67%,respectively.Combining the EBV BALF2 haplotype from nasopharyngeal swabs with the EBV antibody score could increase the specificity of the marker to 95.33%while maintaining the sensitivity of 85.33%.Conclusions EBV high-risk subtypes detected from different specimen sources were closely related to the occurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Combining EBV antibody scores and BALF2 haplotypes in nasopharyngeal swabs had potential value for nasopharyngeal carcinoma screening.

Nasopharyngeal carcinomaEBV antibody scoreEBV BALF2Diagnostic testCase-control design

李雪琪、席俊彦、谢尚杭、林冬丰、周杭宁、马征、彭一楠、曹素梅

展开 >

中山大学公共卫生学院,广东广州 510080

中山大学肿瘤防治中心肿瘤预防研究部,广东广州 510080

华南恶性肿瘤防治全国重点实验室,广东广州 510080

中山大学全球卫生研究中心,广东广州 510080

中山大学卫生信息研究中心,广东广州 510080

广东省鼻咽癌诊治研究重点实验室,广东广州 510080

广东省恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心,广东广州 510080

广东医科大学公共卫生学院,广东东莞 523808

展开 >

鼻咽癌 EBV抗体评分 EBV BALF2 诊断试验 病例对照设计

国家自然科学基金面上项目国家自然科学基金面上项目广东省自然科学基金面上项目

82073625823736552023A1515010221

2024

热带医学杂志
广东省寄生虫学会 中华预防医学会

热带医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.643
ISSN:1672-3619
年,卷(期):2024.24(6)