首页|HBeAg阳性慢乙肝低病毒血症患者换用丙酚替诺福韦疗效分析

HBeAg阳性慢乙肝低病毒血症患者换用丙酚替诺福韦疗效分析

扫码查看
目的 比较换用或联合应用丙酚替诺福韦(TAF)对乙型肝炎e抗原(HBeAg)阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者发生低病毒血症(LLV)后的疗效,探究影响病毒应答的因素.方法 回顾性分析2021年6月-2023年6月在徐州医科大学附属医院就诊的73例经恩替卡韦(ETV)或富马酸替诺福韦酯(TDF)治疗后产生LLV的HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者,根据治疗方式,分为单药组(n=45)和联合组(n=28),随访24、48周,根据患者是否发生完全病毒应答(CVR)分为部分应答组(n=25)与完全应答组(n=48),单因素分析两组间基线特征、实验室指标,并通过logistic回归分析患者病毒未发生完全应答的独立影响因素.结果 第24周联合组CVR率优于单药组,差异有统计学意义(x2=4.073,P=0.044);第48周两组CVR率比较差异无统计学意义(x2=3.314,P>0.05);亚组分析,TDF使用史组第24周联合组CVR率优于单药组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).部分应答组的基线HBV DNA、各组HBeAg、各组HBsAg及第24周丙氨酸氨基转移酶、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶高于完全应答组,差异均有统计学意义(t/Z=3.848、3.900、3.913、2.678、2.059,P均<0.05),部分应答组中TDF使用史的比例高于完全应答组,差异有统计学意义(x2=5.017,P=0.025).基线HBV DNA、TDF使用史是患者治疗48周内不能达到完全应答的独立预测因素(P=0.015,OR:7.849,95%CI:1.483~41.534;P=0.039,OR:5.503,95%CI:1.091~27.757).结论 对 HBeAg 阳性的低病毒血症患者换用或者联用TAF都能较好的提高完全病毒应答的概率;ETV联合TAF在24周完全应答率优于单药TAF;基线HBV DNA、TDF使用史是该类患者治疗48周内未完全应答的独立预测因素.
Efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with low viremia
Objective To compare the efficacy of switching to or combining with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate(TAF)in the treatment of low-level viremia(LLV)in patients with hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B and explore the factors affecting viral response.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 73 HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients who developed LLV after treatment with entecavir(ETV)or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from June 2021 to June 2023.According to the treatment method,they were divided into TAF monotherapy group(n=45)or ETV combined with TAF group(n=28).They were followed up for 24 and 48 weeks.According to whether the patients had complete virogical response(CVR),they were divided into partial response group(n=25)and complete response group(n=48).The baseline characteristics and laboratory indicators between the two groups were analyzed by univariate analysis,and the independent influencing factors of patients'lack of complete viral response were analyzed by logistic regression.Results The CVR rate of the combination group was higher than that of the monotherapy group at week 24,and the difference was statistically significant(x2=4.073,P=0.044).There was no significant difference in the CVR rate between the two groups at week 48(x2=3.314,P>0.05).In subgroup analysis,the CVR rate of the combination group in the TDF history group was higher than that of the monotherapy group at week 24,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The baseline HBV DNA,HBeAg in each group,HBsAg in each group,and alanine aminotransferase,aspartate aminotransferase at week 24 in the partial response group were significantly higher than those in the complete response group(t/Z=3.848,3.900,3.913,2.678,2.059;all P<0.05).The proportion of TDF history in the partial response group was significantly higher than that in the complete response group(x2=5.017,P=0.025).Baseline HBV DNA and TDF use history were independent predictors of patients not achieving complete response within 48 weeks of treatment(P=0.015,OR:7.849,95%CI:1.483-41.534;P=0.039,OR:5.503,95%CI:1.091-27.757).Conclusions Switching to or combining with TAF could effectively improve the probability of complete viral response in HBeAg-positive patients with low viremia;ETV combined with TAF had a better complete response rate at 24 weeks than TAF alone.Baseline HBV DNA and TDF use history were independent predictors of patients not achieving complete response within 48 weeks of treatment.

Chronic hepatitis BLow-level viremiaHBeAgTenofovir alafenamide fumarateVirologic response

陈家辉、万雨林、汪莉萍

展开 >

徐州医科大学附属医院感染性疾病科,江苏徐州 221002

慢性乙型肝炎 低病毒血症 乙型肝炎e抗原 丙酚替诺福韦 病毒应答

2024

热带医学杂志
广东省寄生虫学会 中华预防医学会

热带医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.643
ISSN:1672-3619
年,卷(期):2024.24(11)