首页|基于HJ 75-2017标准与核算指南的燃气机组碳排放监测方法仿真对比分析

基于HJ 75-2017标准与核算指南的燃气机组碳排放监测方法仿真对比分析

扫码查看
准确掌握燃气机组碳排放情况是保证碳交易的保障之一.不少燃气机组开始加装在线气相色谱装置,使燃料端实时监测也成为了一种可能,同时对于未加装CO2监测系统或存在设备空间已满的机组,则通过 O2 体积分数折算进行实时监测是可行路径之一.但不论采用直测还是折算监测方法,在前后端连续监测数据的偏差问题分析上,目前仍然缺乏足够的研究.因此,针对短期内不具备CO2 直测能力的机组,以某F级燃气-蒸汽联合循环发电机组历史数据为仿真对象,基于烟气 O2 体积分数数据换算和燃料在线气相色谱数据进行连续仿真监测分析.结果发现:不同监测方法的月度数据之间没有一致性的大小排序关系,相对偏差有正也有负,年度数据相互偏差均小于 5%;δ RD,R,fluegas-flue-h与烟囱出口烟气排放连续监测系统(continuous emission monitoring system,CEMS)O2 体积分数相关性最高;该机组的碳排放偏差主要集中在负荷率 55%以上的稳燃段;烟囱出口CEMS O2 体积分数和烟囱出口 CEMS 湿烟气流速在满足现有定期检定要求的前提下导致前后端碳排放量偏差的可能性最大;现有技术规范下,前后端均能实现实时监测,可用于趋势分析,但只有燃料端监测方法的仿真相对扩展不确定度小于 5%;对于燃气机组,从燃料端进行碳排放监测可能更加合适,而烟气端监测方法可能更适合燃煤机组.
Comparative analysis of carbon emission monitoring methods for gas-fired units based on HJ 75-2017 and accounting guidelines
Accurate carbon emissions data of gas units is one of the guarantees to ensure carbon trading.Many gas units recently installed online gas chromatography devices,so that the carbon emission is able to be real-time monitored from fuel part.For units that are not equipped with flue gas CO2 monitoring system or have no enough equipment space,conversion with flue gas O2 concentration is one of the feasible paths to monitor carbon emission from flue gas part.But whether direct measurement or conversion monitoring methods,there is still a lack of sufficient research on the deviation of continuous monitoring data from the fuel part and flue gas part.Therefore,for the gas units without capability to directly monitor flue gas CO2 in the short term,this study takes the historical data of an F-class gas-steam combined cycle unit for the simulation,and conducts continuous simulation monitoring and analysis based on the conversion with flue gas O2 concentration and online gas chromatography.It is found that there is no stable sorting rule of the monthly data and the relative deviation between different calculation methods.All the relative deviation of annual data is less than 5%.The correlation between δRD,R,fluegas-flue-h and the O2 concentration of CEMS is the highest.The deviation of carbon emission amount in the unit is mainly in the stable combustion section with a load ratio of more than 55%.In accordance with current standards or specifications,the O2 concentration of CEMS and the wet flue gas flow rate at the chimney outlet is most likely to cause the deviation of carbon emission amount from the fuel part and flue gas part.Under the existing technical specifications,the carbon emission from fuel part and flue gas part can be monitored in real time,which can be used for analysis on trend,but only the uncertainty of result from fuel part is below 5%.For gas units,the carbon emission monitored at fuel part is more appropriate,and the method monitoring the flue gas part may be more suitable for coal-fired units.

gas-fired unitscarbon emissionsfuel sourceflue gas sourcesimulation

陈公达、蔡秀霞、林海、卢伟业、邹祥波、徐昉、马双忱

展开 >

广东能源集团科学技术研究院有限公司,广东 广州 510630

广东粤华发电有限责任公司,广东 广州 510730

湛江海关技术中心,广东 湛江 524022

广东省特种设备检测研究院顺德检测院,广东 佛山 528300

华北电力大学环境科学与工程系,河北 保定 071003

展开 >

燃气机组 碳排放 燃料端 烟气端 仿真

国家重点研发计划项目广东省能源集团有限公司科技项目

2021YFF0601001GEG/AJS-22-002

2024

热力发电
西安热工研究院有限公司,中国电机工程学会

热力发电

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.765
ISSN:1002-3364
年,卷(期):2024.53(2)
  • 30