首页|Analysis of Standards and Effects of Police Indirect Entrapment from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights—Taking"Akbay and Others v.Germany"as an Example
Analysis of Standards and Effects of Police Indirect Entrapment from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights—Taking"Akbay and Others v.Germany"as an Example
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
The European Court of Human Rights(ECtHR)has ruled that illegal indirect entrapment must meet three criteria simulta-neously.This mixed standard requires that the previous direct entrap-ment violates the"essentially passive,"subsequent indirect entrap-ment satisfies the"reasonable foreseeability,"and police entrapment of secondary defendants to commit crimes is considered"decisive."The legal consequences of indirect entrapment are distinguished be-tween general indirect entrapment and illegal indirect entrapment.The basic position of the ECtHR on the consequences of illegal indi-rect entrapment has shifted from supporting mitigating penalties to recognizing procedural dismissal,and general indirect entrapment is considered a mitigating factor in sentencing.Against the backdrop of increasing internationalization of criminal justice standards,the above criteria and positions have strong implications for the improvement of relevant rules in China.
indirect entrapmentdirect entrapmentstandard of legitimacylegal consequence
刘梅湘、侯慧茹、CHEN Feng
展开 >
Criminal Prosecution Research Center of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
