首页|仇恨言论如何构成灭绝种族罪——国际刑法对煽动灭绝种族言论的规制

仇恨言论如何构成灭绝种族罪——国际刑法对煽动灭绝种族言论的规制

扫码查看
作为国际法的重要分支,国际刑法在规制仇恨言论方面提供了诸多规则,形成了较多刑事司法实践.国际刑法对仇恨言论的规制起源于欧洲国际军事法庭,后经特设国际刑事法庭和国际刑事法院的发展,已经产生了一套独特且较为细致的仇恨言论规制机制,主要通过将仇恨言论认定为直接公然煽动灭绝种族以打击最严重的仇恨言论罪行.国际刑法要求行为人具有灭绝种族的特定意图,仇恨言论需满足"直接性"和"公然性"两个要件,而行为人未实际造成灭绝种族的严重后果也可能会受到惩罚.研究国际刑法相关规则和实践的演变对形成规制仇恨言论的国际共识和标准具有重要意义,为了更好地消除互联网时代仇恨言论的危害,各国有必要在国际刑法的基础上,进一步完善仇恨言论的规制以达成更大的共识.
How Hate Speech Constitutes the Crime of Genocide:The Regulation of Incitement to Genocide under International Criminal Law
Hate speech is a long-standing phenomenon in human history.United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres has specifically pointed out that hate speech is highly destructive and has often been a precursor to atrocities,including genocide,in places such as Rwanda,Bosnia,and Cambodia.In the large-scale ethnic violence in Myanmar,hate speech also played a pivotal role in escalating the violence.The Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar established by the UNHRC,the International Criminal Court(ICC)prosecutor,and Gambia,which has filed a case against Myanmar at the International Court of Justice,have all highlighted the dangers of hate speech.Many international human rights instruments recognize freedom of expression;however,this freedom is not absolute and must be limited in certain cases.Specifically,certain forms of hate speech are subject to regulation under international criminal law.At the early stages of the development of international criminal law,the Nuremberg Military Tribunal convicted defendants who engaged in persecution through hate speech.As international criminal law matured,the statutes of ad hoc international criminal tribunals,hybrid tribunals,and the International Criminal Court(ICC)all included provisions addressing hate speech.Studying the regulation of hate speech under international criminal law not only helps understand the current state of international rules and practices but also aids in examining the legal frame-works that prohibit and punish hate speech in other countries.The history of regulating hate speech under international criminal law can be divided into three stages:the first stage,during which early international criminal law sought to criminalize hate speech;the second stage,in which ad hoc international criminal tribunals began to develop frameworks for regulating hate speech related to genocide;and the third stage,marked by new developments under the ICC framework.Currently,international criminal law has established a unique and relatively detailed regulatory mechanism for hate speech,primarily by classifying hate speech as direct and public incitement to genocide,thus targeting the most serious hate speech crimes.International criminal law requires that the perpetrator possess a specific intent to commit genocide,and that the hate speech meet the elements of both"directness"and"publicness".Even if the perpetrator does not directly cause the serious consequences of genocide,they may still face punish-ment.It is difficult to form an internationally recognized treaty on regulating hate speech that all countries would adhere to,but the harmful impact of hate speech is undeniable.To protect individual dignity and self-worth,and to prevent the crimes aris-ing from hate speech,countries must further improve domestic mechanisms for regu-lating hate speech in order to achieve broader consensus.

hate speechfreedom of expressioninternational criminal lawInternational Criminal Courtinternational criminal responsibility

姜居正

展开 >

中国社会科学院大学法学院

奥斯陆大学法学院

仇恨言论 表达自由 国际刑法 国际刑事法院 国际刑事责任

2024

人权法学
西南政法大学

人权法学

ISSN:2097-0749
年,卷(期):2024.3(6)