首页|3种评价牙膏磨损性能的方法比较

3种评价牙膏磨损性能的方法比较

扫码查看
研究比较了表面粗糙度法、ISO11609中附录A的放射性示踪法及附录B的表面轮廓法3种评价牙膏磨损性能的体外实验方法。实验结果表明,对于含有同种类型摩擦剂(二氧化硅或天然碳酸钙)的牙膏试样,表面粗糙度法Ra值的测试结果与放射性示踪法RDA值及表面轮廓法磨损深度的测试结果均具有良好的相关性。同时,与ISO11609中的2种方法相比,表面粗糙度法具有操作简单、刷磨过程压力可控、检测仪器性价比高、数据重复性好、测试结果不易被牙膏配方中磷酸盐等组分干扰等特点。
Comparison of three methods for the measurement of dentifrice abrasivity
Three methods for the in -vitro measurement of dentifrice abrasion performance,the radiotracer method (ISO11609/Annex - A ),the surface profile method (ISO11609/Annex - B ) and a recently introduced method (the surface roughness method)were examined,investigated and compared. The results showed that in case the dentifrices were composed of same type of abrasive agent,either silica or natural calcium carbonate,test results Ra value obtained from surface roughness method,RDA value obtained from radiotracer method as well as the result obtained from surface profile method all display good correlations. Meanwhile,as comparing with the two methods specified in ISO11609,the surface roughness method displays other advantages such as simple operation,pressure controllable in the brushing and abrasion process,high performance price ratio,good repeatability et al. Besides,the results of the surface roughness method are more stable and not affected by the interference of the phosphate in the dentifrice formulations.

dentifriceabrasivitysurface roughness methodradiotracer methodsurface profile method

孙东方、陈健芬、施裔磊

展开 >

黑龙江省轻工科学研究院全国口腔护理用品标准化技术委员会牙膏分技术委员会,黑龙江哈尔滨 150010

上海美加净日化有限公司,上海 200333

牙膏 磨损 表面粗糙度法 放射性示踪法 表面轮廓法

2016

日用化学工业(中英文)
中国日用化学工业研究院

日用化学工业(中英文)

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.553
ISSN:1001-1803
年,卷(期):2016.46(3)
  • 3