日语学习与研究2024,Issue(6) :87-98.

汉日拒绝会话建构类型对比研究

A Comparative Study on Constructive Types of Chinese-Japanese Refusal Conversations

高扬
日语学习与研究2024,Issue(6) :87-98.

汉日拒绝会话建构类型对比研究

A Comparative Study on Constructive Types of Chinese-Japanese Refusal Conversations

高扬1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 西安外国语大学 日本文化经济学院
  • 折叠

摘要

以"请求—拒绝"角色扮演会话为语料,采用话语过程分析法,分析动态语言交际过程中话题上的说者与听者角色交替样态,探究汉日拒绝会话建构类型的异同,揭示差异背后蕴含的心理动因.研究发现:1.汉日拒绝会话均存在"角色固定型""协作的角色回归型""短暂竞争的角色回归型""说者角色竞争型"四种建构类型,其中角色固定型在汉日拒绝会话中均不多见.2.汉语拒绝会话中,双方占据说者角色进行言语互动的情况较多且持续时间长,反映"自我本位取向"的"说者角色竞争型"居多;日语拒绝会话中,双方占据说者角色进行言语互动的情况较少且持续时间短,反映"他者本位取向"的"协作的、短暂竞争的角色回归型"居多.

Abstract

Based on"request-refusal"open role-play conversations,this paper analyzes role exchanges between speakers and listeners in their dynamic language communication using the discursive approach,explores the similarities and differences in the construction types of refusal conversations in Chinese and Japanese,and reveals the psychological motivation behind the differences.Firstly,four discourse patterns are introduced:namely,fixed role,cooperative recurrent role,temporarily competitive recurrent role,and competition for speaker role.Among them,the fixed role is rare in both Chinese and Japanese refusal conversations.Secondly,the"self-oriented"competition for speaker role is the most common in Chinese refusal conversations,in which both sides of the conversation take the role of speaker and usually spend a long time in negotiation.In contrast,the pattern of cooperative or temporarily competitive recurrent role,suggesting the"others-oriented"motive,prevails in Japanese refusal conversations.The case in which both parties play the role of speaker is uncommon,and the two sides are inclined to negotiate in a short time.

关键词

拒绝会话建构类型/话题上的听者/自我本位取向/他者本位取向/汉日

Key words

construction types of refusal conversations/topic listener/self-oriented/others-oriented/Chinese and Japanese

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
日语学习与研究
对外经济贸易大学

日语学习与研究

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.341
ISSN:1002-4395
段落导航相关论文