随着中国设计学界"三大体系"建设研究的展开,如何通过学术语言定义、建构并阐释"中国设计"的主体性特征,已逐渐成为中国设计学界的一个基础性问题.关于"中国设计",虽然已有诸多阐释和讨论,但与其他区域类似概念话语的对比研究和建构反思还相对缺乏.本文遴选在学界已有较多研究的"日本设计"和"北欧设计"学术话语作为比较对象,利用中国知网数据库、Web of Science英文数据库收录的相关文献文本为材料,基于文献计量学方法,分析关于以上三个地区设计的研究主题、研究语汇和词频分布,挖掘分析三者在学术话语建构和认知体系中存在的差异,从而试图为"中国设计"的主体性学术话语建设提供借鉴.
The Current Situation and Reflection on the Academic Discourse Construction of"Chinese Design":A Bibliometric Research Based on Comparison with"Japanese Design"and"Northern Europe Design"
With the development of research on the construction of the"three major systems"in the Chinese design community,how to define,construct,and interpret the subjectivity characteristics of"Chinese design"through academic language has gradually become a fundamental issue in the Chinese design com-munity.Regarding"Chinese design,"although there have been many interpretations and discussions,there is still a relative lack of comparative research and con-structive reflection with similar conceptual discourse in other regions.This article selects academic discourses such as"Japanese Design"and"Northern Europe Design"that have been extensively studied in the academic community as comparative objects.Relevant literature texts collected from the CNKI database and the Web of Science are used as materials.Based on bibliometric methods,the research topics,vocabulary,and frequency distribution of design research in these three regions are analyzed to explore the differences among the three in academic discourse construction and cognitive system and to provide reference for the subjec-tivity of academic discourse construction in"Chinese design".
Chinese designJapanese designNorthern Europe designacademic discoursesubjectivity
万方数据
