首页|水质中总铬含量测定方法对比及应用研究

水质中总铬含量测定方法对比及应用研究

扫码查看
从标准曲线、检出限、精密度、正确度等方面比较电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)、火焰原子吸收分光光度法(F-AAS)和紫外分光光度法(UV)测定水质总铬含量的情况.各方法标准曲线相关系数均能达到0.999,对有证标准物质的分析结果均在真值范围内;ICP-MS检出限2.7×10-5mg/L,测定下限为1.08 × 10-4 mg/L,精密度1.3%~1.9%,正确度为97.9%~103.8%;F-AAS 检出限0.016 2 mg/L,测定下限0.064 8 mg/L,精密度0.6%~4.1%,正确度为96.0%~104.0%;UV检出限0.003 7 mg/L,测定下限0.014 8 mg/L,精密度1.3%~6.6%,正确度为95.0%~102.0%.结果表明三个方法均能准确测定水中总铬含量,应根据实验室条件及样品含量选择合适的方法.
Comparison and Application of Determination Methods for Total Chromium Content in Water Quality
Compare the determination of total chromium content in water by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry,flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry,and ultraviolet spectrophotometry from the aspects of standard curve,detection limit,precision,and accuracy.The correlation coefficients of the standard curves for each method can reach 0.999,and the analysis results for certified standard substances are within the true value range;The detection limit of ICP-MS is 2.7 × 10-5 mg/L,the lower limit of determination is 1.08 × 10-4 mg/L,the precision is 1.3%to 1.9%,and the accuracy is 97.9%to 103.8%;The detection limit of F-AAS is 0.016 2 mg/L,the lower limit of determination is 0.064 8 mg/L,the precision is 0.6%to 4.1%,and the accuracy is 96.0%to 104.0%;The UV detection limit is 0.003 7 mg/L,the determination lower limit is 0.014 8 mg/L,the precision is 1.3%to 6.6%,and the accuracy is 95.0%to 102.0%.The results indicate that all three methods can accurately determine the total chromium content in water,and the appropriate method should be selected based on laboratory conditions and sample content.

water qualitytotal chromiuminductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryflame atomic absorption spectrophotometryUV spectrophotometrycomparative analysis

周洋、吴尧、杨皓越、李雪峰、李沁芸

展开 >

重庆惠能标普科技有限公司,重庆,401121

水质 总铬 电感耦合等离子体质谱法 火焰原子吸收光度法 紫外分光光度法 对比分析

2024

四川化工
四川省化学工业研究设计院 四川省化工信息中心 四川省化工防腐技术情中心站

四川化工

影响因子:0.392
ISSN:1672-4887
年,卷(期):2024.27(6)