首页|不同比例藜麦秸秆和鸭茅混合青贮对青贮品质的影响

不同比例藜麦秸秆和鸭茅混合青贮对青贮品质的影响

扫码查看
[目的]探究不同比例的藜麦秸秆和鸭茅混合青贮对青贮品质的影响。[方法]将藜麦秸秆与鸭茅按鲜重比10∶0(A组)、9∶1(B组)、7∶3(C组)、5∶5(D组)、3∶7(E组)、1∶9(F组)、0∶10(G组)在室温条件下青贮60 d后,取样测定青贮品质。[结果]混合青贮(B组、C组、D组、E组、F组)的粗蛋白(CP)、粗灰分(Ash)、粗脂肪(EE)以及可溶性碳水化合物(WSC)含量均高于藜麦秸秆单贮(A组)。随着鸭茅比例的增加,CP、Ash、EE以及WSC的含量逐渐上升,而酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)和中性洗涤纤维(NDF)值降低。主成分分析提取出2个主成分,累计贡献率为88。9%。主成分综合评定、相对饲喂价值(RFV)和粗饲料分级指数(GI)结果一致,藜麦秸秆单一青贮饲用价值最低,鸭茅单贮饲用价值最高,藜麦秸秆与鸭茅按照3∶7和1∶9的鲜重比混合青贮效果差异不显著,且优于其他混合比例。[结论]藜麦秸秆与鸭茅混合青贮有助于提高青贮品质,鸭茅比例以70%~90%为宜。
Effects of Different Proportions of Quinoa Stalk and Orchardgrass Mixed Silage on Silage Quality
[Objective]This study aims to investigate the impact of mixed ensilage of quinoa straw and or-chardgrass at varying proportions on silage quality.[Method]Quinoa straw and orchardgrass were mixed in fresh weight ratios of 10∶0(A),9∶1(B),7∶3(C),5∶5(D),3∶7(E),1∶9(F),and 0∶10(G),respectively.The mixtures were ensiled for 60 days at room temperature,and samples were collected to as-sess the quality of silage.[Result]Mixed ensilage(Groups B,C,D,E,F)exhibited higher levels of crude protein(CP),crude ash(Ash),crude fat(EE),and soluble carbohydrates(WSC)compared to quinoa straw alone(Group A).With an increase in the proportion of orchardgrass,the content of CP,Ash,EE,and WSC gradually increased,while acid detergent fiber(ADF)and neutral detergent fiber(NDF)values decreased.Principal component analysis extracted two principal components with a cumu-lative contribution rate of 88.9%.Comprehensive evaluation of principal components,relative feed value(RFV)and grading index(GI)consistently indicated that quinoa straw alone had the lowest feeding value,while orchardgrass alone had the highest.Mixed ensilage with quinoa straw and orchardgrass at ra-tios of 3∶7 and 1∶9 in fresh weight showed no significant differences in silage quality and outperformed other mixed ratios.[Conclusion]The mixed silage of quinoa straw and orchardgrass contributes to the improvement of silage quality,with a recommended proportion of 70%to 90%for orchardgrass.

quinoa straworchardgrassmixed silagesilage qualityrelative feed value(RFV)forage grading index(GI)

袁艺、陈冬明、蒋艳君、冉启凡、蒋云、孙庚、刘琳、刘长清、刘伟

展开 >

甘孜藏族自治州畜牧业科学研究所,四川 康定 626000

四川农业大学草业科技学院,成都 611130

甘孜藏族自治州草业技术研究推广中心,四川 康定 626000

重庆市畜牧科学院,重庆 荣昌 402460

四川省农业科学院生物技术核技术研究所,成都 610061

中国科学院成都生物研究所,成都 610041

展开 >

藜麦秸秆 鸭茅 混合青贮 青贮品质 相对饲喂价值(RFV) 粗饲料分级指数(GI)

四川省科技厅重点研发项目甘孜藏族自治州科技计划甘孜州人工饲草生产及加工校州合作项目

2021YFN010521ZKJJH00312023XZHZ05

2024

四川农业大学学报
四川农业大学

四川农业大学学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.657
ISSN:1000-2650
年,卷(期):2024.42(2)
  • 36