首页|常规大剂量二联与三线补救方案在Hp根除失败消化性溃疡患者中的应用临床观察

常规大剂量二联与三线补救方案在Hp根除失败消化性溃疡患者中的应用临床观察

扫码查看
目的:观察常规大剂量二联与三线补救方案在幽门螺杆菌(Hp)根除失败消化性溃疡患者中的应用效果.方法:选择 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月于本院就诊的 68 例Hp根除失败的消化性溃疡患者作为研究对象,依据随机数字表法分为高剂量双联组(n=34)和三线补救组(n=34),高剂量双联组给予高剂量双联方案(高剂量的阿莫西林联合艾司奥美拉唑)治疗,三线补救组实施三线补救方案(西他沙星联合阿莫西林、艾司奥美拉唑).比较两组患者临床疗效、Hp根除率、Hp菌株耐药率以及用药不良反应.结果:三线补救组临床总有效率为 94.12%,高于高剂量双联组的 76.47%(P<0.05);三线补救组Hp根除率(85.29%vs 58.82%)高于高剂量双联组(P<0.05),且Hp菌株耐药率(2.94%vs 20.59%)低于高剂量双联组(P<0.05);三线补救组不良反应发生率(20.59%vs 11.76%)与高剂量双联组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:相较于高剂量二联疗法,三线补救方案在保证安全性的同时可提升 Hp 根除失败消化性溃疡患者的Hp根除率,降低其耐药率,改善其临床症状,建议使用.
Clinical observation on the application of conventional high-dose two-line and three-line remedies in patients with peptic ulcer after failure of Hp eradication
Objective:To observe the effect of conventional high-dose two-line and three-line treatment in patients with peptic ulcer after failure of Helicobacter pylori(Hp)eradication.How:Sixty-eight patients with peptic ulcer who had failed to eradicate Hp were selected from our hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 as study objects,and were divided into high-dose dual-dose group(n=34)and three-line remedial group(n=34)according to random number table method.The high-dose dual-dose group was treated with high-dose dual-dose regimen(high-dose amoxicillin combined with esomeprazole).The third-line treatment group administered the third-line treatment regimen(citafloxacin combined with amoxicillin and esomeprazole).The clinical efficacy,eradication rate of Hp,drug resistance rate of Hp strain and adverse drug reactions were compared between the two groups.Results:The total clinical effective rate of the third-line treatment group was 94.12%,which was higher than that of the high-dose dual group(76.47%)(P<0.05).The eradication rate of Hp in the three-line remedy group(85.29%vs 58.82%)was higher than that in the high-dose dual group(P<0.05),and the drug resistance rate of Hp strain(2.94%vs 20.59%)was lower than that in the high-dose dual group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions in the third-line treatment group(20.59%vs 11.76%)compared with the high-dose combination group(P>0.05).Conclusion:Compared with high-dose combination therapy,the three-line remedy can improve the Hp eradication rate,reduce the drug resistance rate and improve the clinical symptoms of patients with peptic ulcer who failed to eradicate Hp while ensuring safety.

Helicobacter pyloriHigh dose duplexThree-line remedy schemeEradication failurePeptic ulcer

陈福英、徐焱、王真

展开 >

江西医学高等专科学校,江西 上饶 334000

上饶市广信区人民医院,江西 上饶 334100

幽门螺杆菌 大剂量二联 三线补救方案 根除失败 消化性溃疡

2024

四川生理科学杂志
四川省生理科学会

四川生理科学杂志

影响因子:0.575
ISSN:1671-3885
年,卷(期):2024.46(6)