山东财经大学学报2024,Vol.36Issue(5) :29-45.

中国共同富裕水平的区域差异、分布动态演进及收敛性研究

Regional Difference,Dynamic Distribution Evolution and Astringency of China's Common Prosperity Level

尹鸿飞 牛子恒
山东财经大学学报2024,Vol.36Issue(5) :29-45.

中国共同富裕水平的区域差异、分布动态演进及收敛性研究

Regional Difference,Dynamic Distribution Evolution and Astringency of China's Common Prosperity Level

尹鸿飞 1牛子恒2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 山东财经大学财政税务学院,山东济南 250014
  • 2. 山东财经大学经济学院,山东济南 250014
  • 折叠

摘要

基于2011-2019年中国大陆31个省(区、市)的省级面板数据,从整体富裕程度、差异趋同度、结构优化和共享程度四个维度构建共同富裕指标体系,综合运用变异系数赋权法与欧氏距离指数法测度各省份的共同富裕水平,并采用多种方法和模型实证分析中国共同富裕水平的区域差异、分布动态演进及空间收敛性特征.研究发现,中国共同富裕水平差距相对较合理,区域间差异是总体差异的主要贡献来源,区域内差异次之,超变密度最小.同时,全国及东中西部地区共同富裕水平均在不断提升,全国和中部地区共同富裕水平呈现聚合型集聚形态,东部和西部地区共同富裕水平则呈现分散化集聚形态.在不同空间权重矩阵下,全国及东中西部地区共同富裕水平均呈现出显著的空间收敛特征,且条件收敛速度更快,各区域收敛速度从大到小依次为东部、中部与西部地区.另外,在不同时期不同空间权重矩阵下,全国及东中西部地区共同富裕水平在收敛状态、速度上表现出明显差异,全国和东部地区共同富裕水平始终处于收敛状态,而中部和西部地区共同富裕水平在绝对收敛情形下呈现两极分化特征,在条件收敛情形下则始终处于收敛状态.因此,要进一步做好区域发展规划,推动区域协调发展;促进基本公共服务均衡化发展,强化政府为社会和民众提供公共服务的角色;全面贯彻新发展理念,推进共同富裕.

Abstract

Based on the 2011-2019 provincial panel data of 31 provinces(autonomous regions and municipalities)in Chinese Mainland,this study constructs an indicator system of common prosperity from the four dimensions of overall wealth level,difference convergence,structural optimization and sharing degree,measures the common prosperity level of all the provinces by comprehensively using variation coefficient weighting method and Euclidean distance index method,and by adopting multiple methods and models,empirically analyzes the regional differences,dynamic distribution evolution and spatial convergence characteristics of China's common prosperity level.It is found that the gap in China's common prosperity levels is relatively reasonable,and inter-regional differences are the main contributing source to the overall difference,followed by intra-regional differences,with super-variable density being minimal.Meanwhile,the common prosperity levels in the whole country as well as in the eastern,middle and western regions are constantly improving,with the common prosperity levels in the whole country as well as in the middle regions showing an aggregated-type agglomeration form and the common prosperity levels in the eastern and western regions showing a decentralized agglomeration form.Under different spatial weight matrices,the common prosperity levels of the whole country as well as the eastern,middle and western regions show significant spatial convergence characteristics,and the conditional convergence speed is faster.The convergence speed of each region,from highest to lowest,is in the eastern,middle and western regions.Besides,under different spatial weight matrices in different periods,the common prosperity levels of the whole country and the eastern,middle and western regions present significant differences in convergence state and speed,with the common prosperity levels of the whole country and the eastern region being in a convergence state and the common prosperity levels of the middle and western regions showing polarization characteristics under absolute convergence while always being in a convergence state under conditional convergence.Therefore,it is necessary to further improve regional development planning and promote coordinated regional development,promote the balanced development of basic public services and strengthen the governments'role in providing public services to society and the public,and fully implement the new development concept and promote common prosperity.

关键词

共同富裕/区域差异/分布动态演进/收敛性

Key words

common prosperity/regional difference/dynamic distribution evolution/astringency

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

山东乡村振兴实践研究院项目(XCZX2023101)

教育部人文社会科学研究项目(24YJC790220)

山东省社会科学规划研究项目(24DJJJ13)

山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2024QG025)

出版年

2024
山东财经大学学报
山东财经大学

山东财经大学学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.554
ISSN:1008-2670
段落导航相关论文