首页|化疗及化疗联合免疫方案治疗小细胞肺癌的成本-效果分析

化疗及化疗联合免疫方案治疗小细胞肺癌的成本-效果分析

扫码查看
目的 运用成本-效果分析评价化疗(依托泊苷联合卡铂/顺铂)、化疗联合程序性细胞死亡受体配体1(PD-L1,阿替利珠单抗/度伐利尤单抗)和化疗联合程序性细胞死亡受体1(PD-1,斯鲁利单抗)3种方案治疗小细胞肺癌的经济性。方法 回顾性分析山东省立医院2020年1月-2023年4月收治的94例小细胞肺癌患者的病历资料,根据不同治疗方案分为3组,评估3组患者治疗4个周期后的临床疗效,记录不良反应,并进行成本-效果分析。结果 3组客观缓解率分别为:化疗组56。25%,化疗联合PD-L1组63。33%,化疗联合PD-1组62。50%,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。 3组之间白细胞减少、血小板减少、肝功异常不良反应发生情况无显著差异(P>0。05),胃肠道不良反应发生率分别为:化疗组41。66%,化疗联合PD-L1组40。00%,化疗联合PD-1组6。25%,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。以客观缓解率为临床疗效指标,3组治疗方案的成本-效果比分别为480。88、2 026。80和1 001。47;以化疗组为参照,化疗联合PD-L1组和化疗联合PD-1组的增量成本-效果比分别是14 309。06和5 686。81。敏感度分析与成本-效果分析的结论一致。结论 广泛期小细胞肺癌的一线治疗中,单独化疗与联合免疫方案相比,ORR相似,化疗组的成本-效果比最优。
Cost-effectiveness analysis of chemotherapy and chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in the treatment of small cell lung cancer
Objective Cost-effectiveness analysis was used to evaluate the economics of three regimens in the treatment of small cell lung cancer:chemotherapy(etoposide combined with carboplatin/cisplatin),chemotherapy combined with PD-LI(atezolizumab/durvalumab)and chemotherapy combined with PD-1(serplulimab).Methods The medical records of 94 patients with small cell lung cancer admitted to Shandong Provincial Hospital from January 2020 to April 2023 were retrospec-tively analyzed and divided into three groups according to the treatment regimen.The clinical efficacy of the three groups after four cycles of treatment was evaluated,adverse effects were recorded,and cost-effectiveness analysis was performed.Results The objective response rates of the three groups were:chemotherapy group 56.25%,chemotherapy combined with PD-L1 group 63.33%,chemotherapy combined with PD-1 group 62.50%,the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of leukopenia,thrombocytopenia and abnormal liver function among the three groups(P>0.05),and the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions was 41.66%in the chemotherapy group,40.00%in the chemotherapy combined with PD-L1 group,and 6.25%in the chemotherapy combined with PD-1 group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The objective response rate was used as the clinical efficacy index,and the cost-effectiveness ratios of the three groups were 480.88,2 026.80 and 1 001.47,respectively.The incremental cost-effectiveness ra-tios of chemotherapy combined with PD-L1 group and chemotherapy combined with PD-1 group were 14 309.06 and 5 686.81,respectively.The conclusion of sensitivity analysis is consistent with that of cost-effectiveness analysis.Conclusion In the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer,the ORR of chemotherapy alone was similar to that of combined immunization regimen,and the cost-effectiveness ratio of chemotherapy group was the best.

Small cell lung cancerChemotherapyProgrammed cell death-1Programmed death-ligand 1Cost-effec-tiveness analysis

裴一涵、王书平、张金頔、毕云彦、张文

展开 >

山东第一医科大学附属省立医院药学部,山东济南 250021

济南市莱芜人民医院,山东济南 271100

小细胞肺癌 化疗 程序性细胞死亡受体配体1 程序性细胞死亡受体1 成本-效果分析

山东省医学会临床科研资金齐鲁专项多中心临床研究项目

YXH2022DZX02006

2024

药学研究
山东省药品检验所 山东省药学会

药学研究

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.653
ISSN:2095-5375
年,卷(期):2024.43(3)
  • 19