首页|菜用甘薯品种评价及营养品质分析

菜用甘薯品种评价及营养品质分析

扫码查看
原文链接
  • 国家科技期刊平台
  • NETL
  • NSTL
  • 万方数据
本研究对 25 个菜用甘薯品种进行茎尖表型性状描述、食味以及营养品质评价，并对产量进行比较。结果表明:福菜薯 18 号、万菜薯5 号、湘菜薯2 号、鄂菜薯2 号、湘菜薯4 号、宁菜薯3 号、川菜薯211、鄂菜薯3号、福菜薯 23、薯绿 1 号食用品质综合表现与对照福薯 7-6 相当。隶属函数法评价结果表明，叶片营养品质综合排名前十的依次为福菜薯 23、福菜薯 18 号、万菜薯 7 号、湘菜薯 4 号、台农 71、万菜薯 5 号、鄂菜薯 2 号、湘菜薯 3 号、宁菜薯 4 号、鄂菜薯 10 号;叶柄营养品质综合排名前十的依次为鄂菜薯 2 号、万菜薯 5 号、台农71、万菜薯 1 号、广菜薯 3 号、福菜薯 22、宁菜薯 4 号、湘菜薯 4 号、湘菜薯 3 号、宁菜薯 1 号;茎营养品质综合排名前十的依次为万菜薯19 号、湘菜薯4 号、万菜薯8 号、鄂菜薯10 号、台农71、宁菜薯1 号、福菜薯22、川菜薯 211、万菜薯5 号、福菜薯18 号。参试品种中，湘菜薯4 号和川菜薯211 的茎叶产量显著低于对照品种福薯7-6，其余品种均高于对照或与对照相当。生产上可根据菜用甘薯的营养品质和产量特性进行开发利用及配套栽培技术管理。
Variety Evaluation and Nutritional Quality Analysis of Vegetable Sweet Potato
In this study,the phenotype traits of 25 vegetable sweet potato varieties were described,the eating and nutritional qualities were evaluated,and the yield was compared.The results showed that the com-prehensive performance of eating quality of Fucaishu 18,Wancaishu 5,Xiangcaishu 2,Ecaishu 2,Xiang-caishu 4,Ningcaishu 3,Chuancaishu 211,Ecaishu 3,Fucaishu 23 and Shulyu 1 was comparable to that of the control variety Fushu 7-6.The evaluation results based on membership function method showed that the top ten varieties in nutritional quality of leaves were Fucaishu 23,Fucaishu 18,Wancaishu 7,Xiangcaishu 4,Tainong 71,Wancaishu 5,Ecaishu 2,Xiangcaishu 3,Ningcaishu 4 and Ecaishu 10;the top ten varieties in nutritional quality of petioles were Ecaishu 2,Wancaishu 5,Tainong 71,Wancaishu 1,Guangcaishu 3,Fu-caishu 22,Ningcaishu 4,Xiangcaishu 4,Xiangcaishu 3 and Ningcaishu 1;the top ten varieties in nutrional quality of stems were Wancaishu 19,Xiangcaishu 4,Wancaishu 8,Ecaishu 10,Tainong 71,Ningcaishu 1,Fucaishu 22,Chuancaishu 211,Wancaishu 5 and Fucaishu 18.Among the tested varieties,the stem and leaf yield of Xiangcaishu 4 and Chuancaishu 211 were significantly lower than that of the control variety,and that of the other varieties were higher or comparable to the control.In production,the varieties of vegetable sweet potato could be developed and utilized according to nutritional quality and yield characteristics,and managed by integrated cultivation technologies.

Vegetable sweet potatoVariety comparisonEating qualityNutritional qualityYield

田一汝、解备涛、段文学、孔凡丽、董顺旭、张海燕、张立明

展开 >

青岛农业大学农学院,山东青岛 266109

山东省农业科学院作物研究所/农业农村部黄淮海薯类科学观测实验站/特色作物山东省工程实验室,山东 济南 250100

泗水县农业技术推广中心,山东 泗水 273200

山东省农业科学院,山东 济南 250100

展开 >

菜用甘薯 品种比较 食用品质 营养品质 产量

现代农业产业技术体系建设专项山东省薯类产业技术体系建设项目山东省自然科学基金面上项目山东省科技特派员项目山东省泰山产业领军人才工程专项山东省良种工程项目

CARS-10-GW09SDAIT-16-09ZR2021MC0922022DXAL0225LJNY2020022020LZGC004

2024

10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2024.04.005

山东农业科学
山东省农业科学院,山东农学会,山东农业大学

山东农业科学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子：0.578
ISSN：1001-4942
年,卷(期)：2024.56(4)
  • 25